If I understood your cryptic message and shortcuts (any1, cud). You are
asking for a good debugger on Windows for Ruby.
Then I would say it is Netbeans in the downloads section you can just get
the Ruby components.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
I think just reading books, won't solve the problem, v need to have
good editor too for the same..
cud any1 here pls guide about the good editors available in ruby,
although i tried eclipse ganymede, but again its not that effective..
other editors available are of no use??
secondly, debugging is
I've read the book programming Ruby (pragmatic) and felt Ok. But when I
started coding, I still keep thinking in for loops instead of blocks and
closures.
I felt pretty frustated, that now I am going to stick to Java for the rest
of competition. Ruby later
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Selasie A
I am a Ruby coder myself..you can also learn from
www.rubylearning.com
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Rishabh Sonthalia wrote:
> Ruby is it something that u all learnt on ur own, or was it thaught 2 u?
>
> if thaught, where can we learn it from?
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~
Even then I think you would not want to parse input using C++, you'd rather
use Python's regex for that task
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Bartholomew Furrow wrote:
> I think is best to use the language you are most comfortable with, usually
>> how good the algorithm is more important than how
>
> I think is best to use the language you are most comfortable with, usually
> how good the algorithm is more important than how fast the language is.
That's a fair statement. I won't guarantee that every problem is solvable
in every language in the time allotted, but the ones that aren't solv
I think is best to use the language you are most comfortable with, usually
how good the algorithm is more important than how fast the language is.
Carlos Guía
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:11 AM, malugu satyajit
wrote:
> I was of the same opinion and tried to program in Java. But you know I was
> fi
that's right
On 2 Wrz, 08:14, Hawston LLH wrote:
> in fact, i dont think the raw coding speed will be significantly different,
> if you use any of the high level languages. The key issue is whether u can
> figure it out how to solve the problem in your brain first, i think that
> will take much
I was of the same opinion and tried to program in Java. But you know I was
fighting the language instead of language helping me.
Well let me try today. I hope to qualify to think about future options.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Hawston LLH wrote:
> in fact, i dont think the raw coding speed
Ruby is it something that u all learnt on ur own, or was it thaught 2 u?
if thaught, where can we learn it from?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send ema
in fact, i dont think the raw coding speed will be significantly different,
if you use any of the high level languages. The key issue is whether u can
figure it out how to solve the problem in your brain first, i think that
will take much of the coding time, than the raw typing time.
On Wed, Sep 2
But for big input files, 8 minutes might not be enough, I don't know.
I'll try some examples today, before qualification round begins to see if
it's feasible.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:03 AM, malugu satyajit
wrote:
> I guess it should be ok.. 4 minutes is a long long time ;)
> Development speed i
I guess it should be ok.. 4 minutes is a long long time ;)
Development speed is what gives us points here.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Douglas Drumond
wrote:
> It would be nice. I'm thinking in doing it so, but I'm a little afraid of
> running speed.
>
> Douglas
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2
It would be nice. I'm thinking in doing it so, but I'm a little afraid of
running speed.
Douglas
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:35 AM, malugu satyajit
wrote:
> For this contest, is anyone coding in Ruby. I thought it would be a good
> choice because of its brevity and coding speed.
>
>
> --
> Satyaji
14 matches
Mail list logo
