I think that the second round is more suited for the europeans (like
me) and africans, but not for asians.
Anyway, since everyone can compete in the 3 rounds, i think that there
won't be a clear easier round. Round 1A is at 3am here, but i'll
probably try it.
On Sep 10, 12:19 am, Brian Watkins
So have you guys received your confirmation email? Coz I haven't and I
got more than 33 points. Or are you talking about the post on this
forum earlier?
On Sep 9, 6:19 pm, Brian Watkins wrote:
> It looks like I've been assigned to all the rounds: 1A, 1B, and 1C.
> Maybe you have, too.
>
> Which
not yet!
2009/9/10 Bey
>
> So have you guys received your confirmation email? Coz I haven't and I
> got more than 33 points. Or are you talking about the post on this
> forum earlier?
>
> On Sep 9, 6:19 pm, Brian Watkins wrote:
> > It looks like I've been assigned to all the rounds: 1A, 1B, and
same for me not yet! but surely selected...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:33 AM, jiangwen jiang wrote:
> not yet!
>
> 2009/9/10 Bey
>
>
>> So have you guys received your confirmation email? Coz I haven't and I
>> got more than 33 points. Or are you talking about the post on this
>> forum earlier?
>>
round one, you need to be in 1000 out of 78xx
frankly speaking 1 /8
round two, you need to be in 1000 out of 68xx
frankly speaking 1 /7
round three you need to be in 1000 out of 58xx
frankly speaking 1 /6
Considering all participant participate in all rounds
On Sep 10, 8:19 am, Brian Watkins
i didn't get any email, and actually i got 33 points too.
They say that there has been a delay with the confirmation because
they are detecting cheating on the
Qualification round,
have anyone received the confirmation email?
On 9 sep, 22:48, Bey wrote:
> So have you guys received your co
any one got mail of round one ?
it's nearly Thursday over
On Sep 10, 9:27 am, ASTS wrote:
> same for me not yet! but surely selected...
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:33 AM, jiangwen jiang wrote:
>
> > not yet!
>
> > 2009/9/10 Bey
>
> >> So have you guys received your confirmation email? Coz
>
> any one got mail of round one ?
>
> it's nearly Thursday over
>
Not in California when you sent that email. :) You should have received it
by now.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-cod
Apparently the easiest round was 1A. With only 2000~ competitors
getting a positive score, and people advancing by just doing a brute
force algorithm for A.
On Sep 9, 6:19 pm, Brian Watkins wrote:
> It looks like I've been assigned to all the rounds: 1A, 1B, and 1C.
> Maybe you have, too.
>
>
Ya.. i too agree...
I regret why i was not able to attend 1A...
Its the easiest...
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Vexorian wrote:
>
> Apparently the easiest round was 1A. With only 2000~ competitors
> getting a positive score, and people advancing by just doing a brute
> force algorithm for A.
I second that.
Although I performed miserably and I though I'll have to compete in
the morning round after I realized that my large dataset submission
was wrong (losing 30 points), I was surprised that I was qualified
with only 10 points.
On Sep 12, 7:54 am, Vexorian wrote:
> Apparently the easi
I agree about that Round 1A was easiest to qualified, but not in problems,it
was harder than in 1B Round.
2009/9/12 Marian
>
> I second that.
> Although I performed miserably and I though I'll have to compete in
> the morning round after I realized that my large dataset submission
> was wrong (l
Round 1A was a lot easier also regarding the problems ...
And to qualify you needed 9 points against 45 for the round 1B.
Regards,
Cyril.
On Sep 13, 9:49 am, Асямов Игорь wrote:
> I agree about that Round 1A was easiest to qualified, but not in problems,it
> was harder than in 1B Round.
>
> 200
Having participated in all 3 rounds, I personally thought that round C
was the easiest.
Of course, round A was the easiest given that you only had to get one
small right, but you could not possibly guess you only needed a fast
small, so I think people were aiming directly at the larges at first (
Yes, IMO round C was the easiest one, then round B and round A.
You can not use brute force or naive approach to solve any large data
set in round A, but it's possible in round B and C.
Even in round C, problem B is just about some Math calculations.
Lucas Piva wrote:
> Having participated in al
Yes, problems were easiest in 1C, then 1B, and then 1A.
In 1C the shortest time to solve all problems was 30+ mins, in 1B 40+
mins, in 1C 50 mins.
On Sep 13, 5:23 am, Huy Phan wrote:
> Yes, IMO round C was the easiest one, then round B and round A.
> You can not use brute force or naive approach
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Alexei wrote:
>
> Yes, problems were easiest in 1C, then 1B, and then 1A.
> In 1C the shortest time to solve all problems was 30+ mins, in 1B 40+
> mins, in 1C 50 mins.
This does not mean that it was an easier problem set. It could mean
that the solutions were sho
17 matches
Mail list logo
