Re: [gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-06-02 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
The NDA is mainly in case you discover our secret algorithms by mistake, and so you don't share interview questions. Contestants should feel free to share their experiences at the finals. On May 25, 2010 2:39 AM, AdrianKuegel akue...@googlemail.com wrote: Every finalist has to sign a NDA. But

Re: [gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-06-02 Thread Luke Pebody
The onsite finals, in 2008, were really fun. On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Bartholomew Furrow fur...@gmail.com wrote: The NDA is mainly in case you discover our secret algorithms by mistake, and so you don't share interview questions.  Contestants should feel free to share their experiences

[gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-06-02 Thread Shoubhik78
or ACrush may start his own company as well... :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups google-codejam group. To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-26 Thread prayags
Thanks Mario. It was really enlightening read those chat transcripts. Regards prayags -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups google-codejam group. To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send

[gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-25 Thread Shoubhik
Prayags, You are right. But there's got to be exceptions,.. 2 time defending champions ACRush is still participating,which means he's not employed :-) :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups google-codejam group. To post to this group, send email to

[gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-25 Thread AdrianKuegel
Every finalist has to sign a NDA. But you can get some impression by watching the videos of the old google codejams, for example this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYELVszTiikfeature=channel (there are others available, too). On 25 Mai, 09:01, Shoubhik sbos...@gmail.com wrote: Prayags,

Re: [gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-25 Thread Amit Agarwal
went to watch one video and ended up watching all the related videos. Oh man...again I am full of energy!!! -Regards Amit Agarwal www.amitagrwal.com On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:09 PM, AdrianKuegel akue...@googlemail.comwrote: Every finalist has to sign a NDA. But you can get some impression

[gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-25 Thread prayags
Thanks Adrian A picture is more than thousand words they say..here a series of pictures..well I got the idea the about onsite finals. But come on you finalists..just share with us what you have for breakfast usually. (surely doesn't come under NDA ;-) ) Regards prayags -- You received this

Re: [gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-25 Thread Mario Ynocente Castro
I guess the Spotlight Sessions you can find here( http://www.topcoder.com/tc?module=Staticd1=hsd2=spotlightSessions) will be useful. 2010/5/25 Shoubhik sbos...@gmail.com Prayags, You are right. But there's got to be exceptions,.. 2 time defending champions ACRush is still participating,which

Re: [gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-25 Thread Robert
The only reason that he is not employed is that he is still a Ph.D student now. I guess ACRush can choose any IT company he want based on what he performed. Shoubhik wrote: Prayags, You are right. But there's got to be exceptions,.. 2 time defending champions ACRush is still

[gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-24 Thread Shoubhik
Your Are right Prayags,.. Im with u :-) Even I share your enthusiasm. -Regards, Shoubhik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups google-codejam group. To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send

[gcj] Re: Onsite finals

2010-05-24 Thread prayags
Shoubhik I guess we are not going get any replies from the past onsite finalists. They are probably employed by Google and must have signed some NDA :-) OTT: Amit..it was interesting and informative to read your blog. Regards prayags -- You received this message because you are subscribed to