[gcj] Re: RE in Pascal Walk - C++

2020-04-13 Thread Matt Fenlon
Ahh... I was still accessing bstring[i] instead of bstring[0]. It passes all 3 test cases now. Thank you so much for you help! On Monday, April 13, 2020 at 5:14:50 PM UTC-4, porker2008 wrote: > > for some reason, your code passed all 3 tests in my submissions after the > trim() was fixed. > >

[gcj] Re: RE in Pascal Walk - C++

2020-04-13 Thread porker2008
for some reason, your code passed all 3 tests in my submissions after the trim() was fixed. Maybe our submissions are run against different test data? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[gcj] Re: RE in Pascal Walk - C++

2020-04-13 Thread Matt Fenlon
Thank you! I will be aware of nested variables like that. I see the issue with substr() too: it was lopping off more than just the first element in some cases. Thanks for that. The code passes Test set 1 and 2 now. It gives a WA on Test Set 3. Thoughts? On Monday, April 13, 2020 at 4:52:51 PM

[gcj] Re: RE in Pascal Walk - C++

2020-04-13 Thread porker2008
your trim function is not working properly. To fix it, you can try *string trim(string bstring) {* * for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) {* * if (bstring[0] == '0') bstring = bstring.substr(1);* * else return bstring;* * }* * return bstring;* *}* Also you have nested loop reusing loop variable *i*,