[gcj] Re: RE in solution for parenting partnering returns

2020-04-09 Thread Pronoy Mandal
This is the final code which clears all test cases. T = int(input()) for i in range(1,T+1): N=int(input()) jobs=[] for x in range(N): jobs.append(tuple(map(int, input().split(' ')))+(x,)) L = [0]*N cj=[0,0] m = sorted(jobs) imp = False for j in m:

[gcj] Re: RE in solution for parenting partnering returns

2020-04-08 Thread Pronoy Mandal
So I think I have found out the reason for RE. *I didn't consider fully overlapping job intervals*. Due to this when a fully overlapping interval is in the test set, the dictionary just updates to a new value with the key remaining same. In this case first (1,10) points to the value 0 then it

[gcj] Re: RE in solution for parenting partnering returns

2020-04-07 Thread porker2008
You can try the following test case *1* *2* *1 10* *1 10* Expected output *Case #1: CJ* (or *JC*) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to