2008/11/25 Stuart McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/11/25 Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan Haleby brought up an interesting approach to proxing classes
without the limitations introduced by ASM/CGLIB such as:
- requiring no-op constructors
- preventing the use of final or private methods
-
That's essentially what I'm doing, but first I need to understand if
CGLIB proxies work the way I understand or not. That is, do they contain
the data or do they redirect calls to another instance as Hibernate does
(at least, I remember it doing so)?
Gili
tzwoenn wrote:
A simpler
2008/11/26 Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Stuart,
It is my understanding that all of the difficulties come from proxing
concrete classes, not interfaces (the latter can be proxied quite
easily using the core API).
that's why I always prefer to program to interfaces ;)
I think it's well
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
my main concern is how you'd handle the situation where someone else is
using class (A) but Guice wants to proxy it by rewriting - the new
definition
(A') would need to be loaded into another classloader, but that means that
class A and class A' are incompatible, and
I'm having similar problems using Guice with Struts 2 + Hibernate.
I dunno if Guice is part of the problem, when the PermGen error appears
always is related to C3P0 pool created by Hibernate and the Logger stuff.
jordi
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Dhanji R. Prasanna [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It's not Guice. It's because an instance of something (like a logger)
from your application is being referenced by something outside your
application.
jordi's webapp classloader - class - *instance* - something -
something's class - a parent classloader
As long as this strong reference chain
2008/11/26 Gili Tzabari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
my main concern is how you'd handle the situation where someone else is
using class (A) but Guice wants to proxy it by rewriting - the new
definition
(A') would need to be loaded into another classloader, but that means
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
it's the eager proxying that I'm worried about - could get hairy
for example: how do I tell Guice about the class that should be proxied
without actually loading that class (as Guice works primarily on types)
Alternatively you could register the Guice
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:22 AM, jordi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Looking at the console log i see this message when redeploying:
A C3P0Registry mbean is already registered. This probably means that an
application using c3p0 was undeployed, but not all PooledDataSources were
closed prior
Right now i'm restarting jordi's webapp server when changes happen.
There's no doubt that's the easier thing to do, but for seconds you got a
403 on the main page. Just one server at this time... i'll do some fancy 403
twitter-style page and no problem with that.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:27 PM,
2008/11/26 Gili Tzabari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
it's the eager proxying that I'm worried about - could get hairy
for example: how do I tell Guice about the class that should be proxied
without actually loading that class (as Guice works primarily on types)
I guess I agree with you for the most part. Thing is, for all this talk
about how it's all fixable no one actually done so... I don't recall
hearing of a single project that tried to improve the situation. I might
sound silly saying this... but it really ticks me off. I hate using
Perhaps I'm mistaken but mabey aspectj would be able to help you here?
AJDT works in the Eclipse environment and thus should work in OSGi as
well and afaik it would be possible to do delegation without proxying
the classes using this approach? I think Spring uses aspectj to inject
beans to
Author: limpbizkit
Date: Tue Nov 25 00:43:49 2008
New Revision: 700
Added:
trunk/src/com/google/inject/binder/AnnotatedElementBuilder.java
trunk/src/com/google/inject/binder/PrivateBinder.java
trunk/src/com/google/inject/spi/Exposure.java
14 matches
Mail list logo
