I'm new to Guice, and I'm using injection within an interceptor, with
requestInjection() in my module.
The interceptor is being called just fine, so my module appears to be
good. The problem is that @Inject is always creating a new object
using the constructor for that object instead of injectin
I'm trying to write a profiler that basically intercepts a method, do
a timing around it before executing it. As I was walking through the
code, the line
Enhancer.getMethods(declaringClass, null, methods);
in ProxyFactory returns a List of _public_ methods. What about non-
public methods? Th
STARTING A WRITING CAREER OR HOW I S...STARTING A WRITING CAREER OR HOW I
S...STARTING A WRITING CAREER OR HOW I S...
http://copywriting123.50webs.com/starting-a-writing-career-or-how-i-s.html
http://copywriting123.50webs.com/starting-a-writing-career-or-how-i-s.html
http://copywriting123.50web
Thanks Johan (as well as all the other helpful mailing list members) for the
suggestion. I already tried Javassist, but it doesn't support annotations.
It handled any method declaration I threw at it, but if I added a (fully
qualified) annotation, it was failing. (Currently I'm using a similar
appr
You could try out Javassist, it's easy and capable of many things and
you basically don't have to know anything about byte-code to use it.
/Johan
Jim Andreou wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion. I see JCatapult's scope is far wider than
> a bytecode manipulation framework. Could you give me a
Thanks for the suggestion! That's quite close, since it indeed creates
annotated classes/methods. Although I don't find a way to put method
bodies/callbacks (it seems it only creates empty or abstract methods).
Regards,
Dimitris
2009/6/18 Rodrigo Couto
>
> You might want to try ClassMock: http:
You might want to try ClassMock: http://classmock.sourceforge.net/
-- Rodrigo Couto
On Jun 17, 5:44 pm, Jim Andreou wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion. I see JCatapult's scope is far wider than a
> bytecode manipulation framework. Could you give me a more precise pointer
> regarding what part
