I have the following scenario that I thought would fall under JIT
bindingshttps://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/JustInTimeBindings,
but it's not working. Is it even possible, either with JIT bindings or
another Guice feature?
interface MyInterface {}
@Anno
class ImplA implements
Ok, so my situation is that I have a rich-client Java app that I want to
run on Windows, Mac, and Linux
The original code for this unfortunately has some horrible
platform-specifisms.
- The code that works out where the user configuration is
- This isn't too hard to do with a
Hi,
Guice has had a big impact with the things I code, particular in developing
and bringing together a modular system + then the testing that goes with it.
However, I am struggling to find a nice way to do reusable components and
in part is due to my inexperience with all of this.
Examples
Hi,
I've been reading quite a lot of documentation around named bindings,
factorymodulebuilder, mapped bindings and it is still not clear if I can
achieve something along the following lines.
For example I want a Factory to be able to look up different services at
runtime based a key. In
I have a following hierarchical structure:
public class ItemImpl extends RepositoryBaseItemImpl {
@Inject
ItemImpl( dependency ) {
super( dependency )
}
}
public class RepositoryBaseT extends BaseT {
public RepositoryBase( dependency ) { //Constructor without @Inject
The question is detailed here.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18505960/giving-a-value-to-provider-in-guice/18520477
I don't know if any of the following are possible:
- Obtain the instance of ClassX within the module code, without
partitioning the the modules into separate injectors.
- If
I have used a singleton EJB. First time when Guice constructs the injector,
give the reference to an EJB.
Later on always access EJB to get Injector reference.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:38 PM, dim5b dmpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you fin a solution /example implementation to your problem facing
you can achieve that with a Multibindings [1] and MapBinder [2]
In your module:
public void configure() {
MapBinderString, Service mapbinder = MapBinder.newMapBinder(binder(),
String.class, Service.class);
It is usually hard to manage scopes that aren't dependent on threads. Non
thread-based scopes usually require a only one context is active at a
time mode, and you can just switch between the contexts. If that applies
to you, then that's doable -- you'll just need some static external state
Guice cannot do JIT bindings that include binding/qualifier annotations.
Binding annotations are not valid on classes, and Guice does not look for
them there.
sam
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, John Nham jn...@google.com wrote:
I have the following scenario that I thought would fall under
What matcher are you using?
sam
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:55 PM, mayumi mayumi.liyan...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a following hierarchical structure:
public class ItemImpl extends RepositoryBaseItemImpl {
@Inject
ItemImpl( dependency ) {
super( dependency )
}
}
public
In this kind of situation I would try to put my non-reusable code behind
[well-thought] interfaces as much as possible. Think about all the [known]
use-cases and really try and separate the common logic from the custom
logic. If you can hide the state behind a logical interface that has always
Have you considered crawling all of your classes and writing a generic bind
method that you can call for any found class that extends View? (see:
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/javatips/jw-javatip113.html?page=2)
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, David Parish dpar...@gmail.com wrote:
We use
We use GWT, GIN and the MVP pattern. All the views inherit from the same
base interface (our.View). I'm trying to create more tests but the number
of views has gotten rather large. Can I take advantage of the fact that
all views inherit from the base View and somehow inject a Mock of the
I had a problem because I did not use a dependency in the appropriate
scope. The dependency was *request scoped* but I injected it directy in a
*singleton
*object... Fun stuff followed!
I was wondering about best practices to help reduce those wrong scopes bugs.
Would it be a good pattern to
I just realized that it may be wrong to always get two different instances
of a dependency when calling two times its getter, when the dependency has
no scope...
Anyway, I'll still interested by suggestions on how to minimize those scope
bugs!
--
You received this message because you are
So, I would personally recommend not doing that except at the edges of a
system that uses D-I and a system that doesn't. Generally speaking, I
would tend to suggest that if you need to inject a request-scoped object
into a singleton, then it isn't really a singleton, or the other isn't
really
Revision: 9a9e69672f18
Author: sberlin sber...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Sep 3 17:07:44 2013 UTC
Log: Edited wiki page ExternalDocumentation through web user interface.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=9a9e69672f18repo=wiki
Modified:
/ExternalDocumentation.wiki
Comment by alexandr...@gmail.com:
Guice 4 supports async servlet?
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=650
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice40
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
19 matches
Mail list logo
