Many thanks! Much more clear.
在 2013年1月5日星期六UTC+8下午8时14分48秒，Mikhail Mazursky写道：
>
> The first way you implicitly bind to an instance (so provider is
> singleton itself - guice will never instantiate it):
> bind(BaseModelProvider.class).toInstance(new BaseModelProvider());
> bind(Model.class).ann
Many thanks! Much more clear.
在 2013年1月5日星期六UTC+8下午9时31分33秒，Thomas Broyer写道：
>
>
> On Saturday, January 5, 2013 11:34:22 AM UTC+1, Michael wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I found a very interesting thing about the scope of the provider. Here is
>> the code of BaseModelProvider
>>
>> public class Ba
The first way you implicitly bind to an instance (so provider is
singleton itself - guice will never instantiate it):
bind(BaseModelProvider.class).toInstance(new BaseModelProvider());
bind(Model.class).annotatedWith(Names.named("index")).toProvider(BaseModelProvider.class);
The second way you imp
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 11:34:22 AM UTC+1, Michael wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I found a very interesting thing about the scope of the provider. Here is
> the code of BaseModelProvider
>
> public class BaseModelProvider implements Provider {
> private int num;
> @Override
> public Model get(
Hi All,
I found a very interesting thing about the scope of the provider. Here is
the code of BaseModelProvider
public class BaseModelProvider implements Provider {
private int num;
@Override
public Model get() {
System.out.println(num++);
return new Model();
}
--
