> Here it is.
>
> http://hungryvt.com/map_tests/google-php/big_combo.php
firebug no show error. javascript happy!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@google
Success! Thank you all for your help and forcing me to find the
solution on my own, especially xelawho.
I've put the whole thing into an external JS file. There's still more
work to be done, but this was the big stumbling block I'd been banging
my head against for the last couple of weeks.
Here i
On Oct 26, 8:36 am, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Again, I'll askcan it be done in two separate functions?
Yes. You can do it in as many functions as you want. Both functions
will need to have access to the "map".
-- Larry
>
> On Oct 26, 4:16 am, Rossko wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > Both could
Yes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Again, I'll askcan it be done in two separate functions?
On Oct 26, 4:16 am, Rossko wrote:
> > Both could be executed with the window.onload command, rather than the
> > body tag.
>
> Why 'both'? You don't need everything to happen at once. There is
> absolutely nothing stopping you havin
> Both could be executed with the window.onload command, rather than the
> body tag.
Why 'both'? You don't need everything to happen at once. There is
absolutely nothing stopping you having code that geolocates, plots a
map, requests some XML, plots some XML, etc in sequence.
--
You received t
So... Yes, it can be done in two separate functions?
Both could be executed with the window.onload command, rather than the
body tag.
On Oct 25, 11:30 pm, "jufemaiz:joel" wrote:
> Yes - you just need to be referencing the same "map" (I'm assuming "map
> making" is the akin to creating the map it
Yes - you just need to be referencing the same "map" (I'm assuming "map
making" is the akin to creating the map itself, whereas adding/removing
points is a secondary action).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To
Is it possible to leave the map making and geolocation to one
function, and just add markers to the one map with a separate
function?
or
Does the map drawing and marker placement all have to be done in one
function?
On Oct 25, 1:02 pm, Rossko wrote:
> > It looks
> > like there are two maps be
> It looks
> like there are two maps being drawn and the DB map is blocking out the
> geolocation map.
Yep, that's exactly it, it does what you tell it to do.
> function load() {
> var map = new google.maps.Map(document.getElementById("map"), {
Makes a map in the with id map.
>
Javascript Smash! Javascript, meet Hulk. Hulk, meet Javascript.
OK, so here's one I ran through Firebug that isn't showing me any
errors. It attempts to combine the geolocation with the DB listings,
though still keeping the code separate for the two functions. It looks
like there are two maps bein
> I was able to get it so the functions load (as seen with the alert on
> Listings), but it's still not populating the map_canvas.
> I suspect this line might be a key to overcoming this:
> bindInfoWindow(marker, map, infoWindow, html);
I don't think your alert actually shows anything, as it just
> I was able to get it so the functions load (as seen with the alert on
> Listings), but it's still not populating the map_canvas.
>
> I suspect this line might be a key to overcoming this:
> bindInfoWindow(marker, map, infoWindow, html);
I don't think your laert actually shows anything, as it jus
So I took your advice and I put the geolocation and the DB listings in
separate functions (tasks).
I was able to get it so the functions load (as seen with the alert on
Listings), but it's still not populating the map_canvas.
I suspect this line might be a key to overcoming this:
bindInfoWindow(m
> earlier quote - "I'm guessing that it should go on the main page
> instead of being
> placed within the XML output of the business listings, since that's
> server side info, and user location is client side."
Yes, that would make sense, as javascript placed in a file being
treated as XML data is
> It may be that you haven't grasped how php works? ALL the php is run
> at server, any output is assembled into a page which is sent to the
> client, THEN the client builds the display and runs any javascript.
Yes I do understand that PHP is server side and JS is client side and
that AJAX can ma
> Agreed, and it seems like it's a waste of time to try to mix PHP into
> that function.
It may be that you haven't grasped how php works? ALL the php is run
at server, any output is assembled into a page which is sent to the
client, THEN the client builds the display and runs any javascript.
>
> Whatever geolocation code you put in before that, your php writes in
> the centre values here effectively hardcoded. Have you used your
> browser's 'view source' feature to see what actually gets sent to the
> browser by your php?
I forgot to mention those. I put those in there in a side expe
> var map = new google.maps.Map(document.getElementById("map"), {
> center: new google.maps.LatLng( $row_result_loc['loc_lat'];?>, ),
Whatever geolocation code you put in before that, your php writes in
the centre values here effectively hardcoded. Have you used your
browser's '
19 matches
Mail list logo
