Thanks Nianwei.
I believe this is a very important feature that Google Map API needs to
support. There will be more and more people start using custom projection as
it will provide a lot of benefits.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps Ja
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=2951
Does not seem to be a high priority though. It may require quite a bit
change in the API's canvas based rendering on polys, and not many
people complained.
On May 4, 12:55 pm, James wrote:
> Thanks Rossko.
>
> I want to know if any
Thanks Rossko.
I want to know if any efforts taken to fix the problems. Or at least it's
been taken into some accounts already.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-map
> I implemented the UTM projection and it seems to work for markers and
> tiles, but does not seem to work properly with rendering polygons and
> polylines.
That's what the man told you
"you may run into problems for polygon and polylines "
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
I implemented the UTM projection and it seems to work for markers and
tiles, but does not seem to work properly with rendering polygons and
polylines.
please see the screenshot which shows the problems:
1) the four markes supoosed to be the four votices of the polygon trying to
render, but
Thanks for your explainatino and it helped me a lot.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
goo
resoulition0 is something specific to the tileset I used in the
sample, it may not apply to you at all. If the tileset's zoom level is
not same as Google's level, say, it's level 0 is really equivalent to
Google's level 10, some sort of z level shift is necessary for tile
coordinates.
The important
Thanks Nianwei. The sample code is great for me to start with.
I studied the code and am a little bit confused with the variable
resolustion0 (default value 1024). I understand all the calculations
related, based on which I assume it should work with different valuse like
2048 or 512, but it d
The projection implementation in V3 is more limited compare to V2. UTM
should not be a problem if you use V2. It's still doable in V3, but
you may run into problems for polygon and polylines (markers works
fine). You can try follow this example to implement your UTM.
http://code.google.com/apis/map
