I'm also making Wave my main form of communication. My plan is to use
robots to post on behalf of members until wave is public. My idea
would work simularly to the way tweety works.
On Oct 18, 8:07 pm, Alf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am thinking about to use Wave as a main method of conversations on
>
I noticed that. in the preview it shows online status now. it did that
in the dev. so does that mean that Devloper == Alpha and the preview
== beta??
On Oct 19, 2:29 am, "pamela (Google Employee)"
wrote:
> We have just pushed a new version of the Sandbox and Preview servers, along
> with various
they don't really need to make the whole "being able to use the
plateform without having it" since they created robots. Robots would
have the ability to do all that. Kinda Simular to how tweety works but
with forms and other sites.
On Oct 16, 1:04 am, Eric Dorman wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> What are
sorry for not being able to reply before. <_< not sure why it wouldn't let
me. but Oliver if you focus on just making a GUI even if it's in a different
language and make the actual getting of Wave data into it's own "core" that
can be replaced in the future you should be fine with leaving it as is
I'd be willing to help test. Also my wave ID is Xcom923
On Oct 13, 12:30 am, Oliver Baker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It was my intention from the beginning to make a Tool for your Desktop
> which would tell you when you have new Waves. And I was surprised that
> nobody had made one before me, so, I ha
But you have got it working for the most part?? is it possible that I
help you test this? I haven't started programming robots but I'm
interested in being able to ping a bot to update without the wave
being open.
On Oct 11, 4:25 am, James Purser wrote:
> I'm writing a basic gmail->gwave bridge u
