This is a real travesty. To cancel Wave due to lack of adoption is pretty
short-sighted.
Wave wasn't fully developed, it needed better integration with legacy tools
like e-mail, and it needed a fully functional open sourced platform such that
federation would be possible. Without these, to hope
On 3 May 2010, at 05:37, Kevin Gamble wrote:
> Now that we can embed waves on external sites does anyone know how Google
> crawls these? My searches for wave content using my site search have been
> coming up empty. Just curious if anyone knows how this is or isn't working.
More importantly: h
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:59, Bart Thate wrote:
> Well one thing i know from my IRC days is that its best to put the
> power into the owner hands and NOT distribute this power to other
> participants as you will get the old take-over days all over again.
It all depends. Waves between friends, in a co
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:23, Bart Thate wrote:
> Its not that i can save this wave, i demonstrates a deeper underlying
> problem, that is the lack of a permissions system that allows the
> owner to determine what participants can and cannot do.
And for that matter, the creator/owner's ability to rem
On 10 Feb 2010, at 06:50, kayode odeyemi wrote:
> But I support the opinion about integrating Gmail into Wave. Reason is
> because there's hardly no conversation without email these days.
There are a few things that need to be done. As fascinating as Wave is, it will
have an adoption struggle b
On 7 Jan 2010, at 18:04, pamela (Google Employee) wrote:
> Hmm- I'm not sure it's intuitive to put "Done" in Priority column. It
> seems like it should be a separate checkbox.
Agreed. Even more to the point, there's a difference between the priority and
the status.
The status may not just be "t
