On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Brian Slesinsky bslesin...@gmail.com wrote:
It will be more convenient for Google if all Java code and Java resources
(that is, things in the classpath) are contained in directories named either
java or javatests, and the path from there is where the file should
On Friday, November 16, 2012 12:42:11 AM UTC+1, Arash wrote:
Yes I am using STS which comes with m2e, also I do have the following in
my pom
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-eclipse-plugin/artifactId
First, check your classpath (in the launch configuration that is, not only
the build path of the project) as well as the source tab in the launch
configuration, to make sure it's not a mistake on your part.
Then, it might be a bug in Eclipse, so I'd close the stg-* project when not
working on
Hello,
I would like to use gwt-comet:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-comet/
To get started, I tested the chat application provided with on the project
site:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-comet/wiki/ChatExample
I also got the example running: It works fine within eclipse and with GWT
development
As the server has no idea in which mode the client runs, the client has to
tell it the server.
The default RpcRequestBuilder adds the header x-gwt-permutation to server
requests to prevent CSRF attacks. It contains the permutation name in
production mode and HostedMode when running DevMode. So
On Friday, November 16, 2012 11:04:41 AM UTC+1, tong123123 wrote:
I think it is eclipse problem, I check the run configuration source,
classpath and it point to central..., no problem, then I close the stg...
project, and everything is correct now!!
(centralLaunchArgument,
I have been able to draw the label, still I can't get the positioning
right. This is the code in case someone wants to do something similar:
public class MapLabel {
private Element div;
private LatLng latLng;
private SimplePanel textPanel;
private String text;
private
Poll results: option 3, aka src/main/resources + src/main/super.
Bonus: it apparently works with the latest version of the GPE (wasn't the
case before, where it –basically– only looked into src/main/java)
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:51:36 PM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Hi all,
As some
where can we see the results?
On Wednesday, 19 September 2012 15:23:24 UTC+2, Joonas Lehtinen wrote:
What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
How should GWT develop?
What technologies should it better support?
...
We all would like to get answers to these questions, right? To do so, we
Hi! I have the same problem and after solving the issue and reading this
posts I have some opinions I will like to share.
I think this is a conceptual problem. RequestFactory cant solve the
parent hierarchy because of multiple inheritance of interfaces. If you have
a class class A implements
I am not sure, if I understood your question. Anyways, I will try to
explain. I am setting getting an employee's name and designation from a
database call based on some validation (login panel user name/password).
After getting the details, I am setting cookies in the client side. Now, in
my
Hi Marius,
in that case I also have a hint for you:
I have retro-fitted my own OSS lib for GWT.
The lib is here:
https://github.com/m-m-m/mmm/tree/master/mmm-util/mmm-util-core
I added another module/lib that contains the GWT related config and
portation code:
Hi Jens,
thanks for your feedback. The memory leak is also what we discovered. You
can see that with -verbose:gc,
We are in the progress of migrating to x64 and adding lots of RAM. Your
hints give some hope that this will help.
So far we can only use 3,5 GB RAM what is too little. We already
Hi Thomas,
I have been out on devoxx and haven`t had time to cast a vote yet.
I think its a good idea to go with a separate package like src/main/super
for super sourcing.
Why are we thinking of moving resources out of src/main/java, what is the
main advantage here?
-Daniel
On Friday,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I fully understand that we'll have to make some concessions for GWT
itself to make it easier for Google (even though Matthew actually told
me the opposite);
Well, our build system is turing complete, so theoretically
I don't think your getting dozens of dependencies from atmosphere. If you
have a maven build...atmosphere just has two GWT dependencies you need to
specify, with all transitive dependencies its about 7-8 jars but you could
exclude container specific jars if you wanted.
Also you don't need to
Hi all,
I need to make my GWT app work with Googlebot. It seems that it tries to
load the app, but fails because its user agent is unrecognized. I would
like to give it the 'safari' version of the app.
Is it possible to set a default user.agent, which is used if the user agent
is
Hi,
I'm getting some problems to run GWT in IE. It works for all browsers
except the IE.
I have tried in IE 7 and IE 8 both got this error.
Webpage error details
Message: Object doesn't support this property or method
Line: 357
Char: 464
Code: 0
URI:
I wrote two different generators (using GWT 2.5) to simplify a couple
processes and automate the writing of boilerplate code. It works just fine
in dev mode. What I'm noticing when I compile my app for production
though, is the generated classes are only used in one of the permutations.
All
Thank you Xi, this is a excellent solution, this helps me very much, God
bless you.
El viernes, 16 de septiembre de 2011 11:02:54 UTC-5, Xi escribió:
Hi,
I've used http://sourceforge.net/projects/migbase64/ in my
application, to convert the byte array to a base64 string, which works
Le 16 nov. 2012 17:59, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi Thomas,
I have been out on devoxx and haven`t had time to cast a vote yet.
I think its a good idea to go with a separate package like src/main/super
for super sourcing.
Why are we thinking of moving resources out of
Oops, my mistake! Carry on.
On Friday, November 16, 2012 12:00:57 AM UTC-8, Thomas Broyer wrote:
The scope of this poll is however not about GWT itself actually (we'll
see if we can apply the outcome to GWT or not; I'd love to do it so
that GWT can serve as a reference, but if it's
Hi,
I've made up a starter project to demonstrate the combination of GWT /
JMS / COMET / SPRING / JTA / Hibernate. If you like have a look at Githup :
https://github.com/raupach/gwt-spring-jpa-jta-jms-comet-hibernate
The Projekt did not use 'atmosphere'. It use the Javascript frontend
Hello,
I have a small chat within my chess application. The chat messages are
displayed within a CellTable, which has a Pager and an AsyncDataProvider.
The data provider fetches the messages from the server and pushes them into
the CellTable via the onRangeChange method. So far, so good.
When
Thanks for the pointer to the ScriptInjector, didn't know that before.
It's not that I don't want to update my libraries, but in my case the 3rd
party library I am using to include flash content (gwt2swf) seems to be no
longer maintained. So I guess I *have* to do it by myself using the
Cristian,
We are running Spring, we we use Spring DI in the Spring container.
Sincerely,
Joseph
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Joseph R Lust
(919) 355-8785
joseph.r.l...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Cristian Rinaldi csrina...@gmail.comwrote:
Joseph, thanks a
Is Chrome Frame installed in IE?
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/aE3IA4c3BlMJ.
To post to this group, send email to
Should we rename the *JreSuite in e.g. RequestFactory to *SuiteNoBrowser
too? I kind of like this naming scheme, easier to deal with than *Suite vs.
*JreSuite.
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:42:48 PM UTC+1, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
Reviewers: mdempsky,
Description:
Move non-GWTTestCase
Are you still using GWT 1.7.1?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13357567/kineticgwt-the-import-com-google-gwt-canvas-cannot-be-resolved
Also, this group is for discussion around contributions to the GWT
codebase; for support regarding the use of GWT, please
use
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we rename the *JreSuite in e.g. RequestFactory to *SuiteNoBrowser
too? I kind of like this naming scheme, easier to deal with than *Suite vs.
*JreSuite.
Good point, I hadn't seen those. Yes I like my name better
Thx. It's fixed after I moved to latest gwt.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you still using GWT 1.7.1?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13357567/kineticgwt-the-import-com-google-gwt-canvas-cannot-be-resolved
Also, this group is for discussion
31 matches
Mail list logo
