Hi Goktug and Thomas,
Thank you for your responses. Thomas, I recognize your name immediately.
Goktug, I see that you are also a member of the GWT team. Obviously, you
are both in a position to know how this feature would best be implemented.
If you say that it is better for Protocol Buffer s
Hi,
I had the same problem..
the com/google/gwt/core/client/GWTBridge is inside the dev.jar and adding
this jar on the server side will fix the problem..*its a 30mb jar I dont
recommend this)
or u can just take this class and add it to the servlet.jar ...
The class is just un extension of the
This is pretty awesome - scss is a superset of css3, so including this
linker means that GWT CSS can now fully use CSS3?
It shouldn't affect runtime javascript size, or compile time (much) or
anything like that, as it just unplugs the GWT CSS compiler, and plugs in
the CSS3/SCSS compiler, corre
Ok i see. Still my pojos are so light weight it seems easier to go with
gwt-rpc an regular pojos for now.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, December 21, 2012 1:17:08 PM UTC+1, Cenk Oguz wrote:
>>
>> Requestfactory is more for CRUD style operations.
>
>
> Tha
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, vi
Thank you I'll take a look...
On Friday, December 21, 2012 10:43:42 PM UTC-5, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, December 21, 2012 6:40:24 PM UTC+1, Ara Yapejian wrote:
>>
>> I'm also seeing this, has their been any updates or anyone know of a fix?
>
>
> Please refer to the issue linked in th
