GWT requires browser plugin Google Web Toolkit Developer Plugin to run it
in Development mode...
Does it require a browser plugin even to deploy in a application
server(production mode)?
Regards,
Nalini.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google
Hi All,
I am aware of remote procedure call (RPC) and using asynchronous call back
in that.
My question : is it possible to use asynchronous call back for client side
method.
for ex: client method 1 calls another client method 2, once call returns to
client method 1 asynchronous call back
Hey I try to use Super Dev Mode in my web app.
But I always get the message
Can't find any GWT Modules on this page. code serverhttp://127.0.0.1:9876/
I follow these Steps to get Super Dev Mode running in eclipse:
1. *add* add-linker name=xsiframe /
set-configuration-property
GWT has a generic callback interface that you can use as method parameter
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/Callback.java
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
After you have compiled your GWT app to JavaScript using the GWT compiler
you don't need a plugin anymore as the browser now can execute the
JavaScript directly.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from
Did you compile your module once with the xsiframe linker and
devModeRedirectEnabled?
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:09:59 AM UTC+1, Dominic Warzok wrote:
Hey I try to use Super Dev Mode in my web app.
But I always get the message
Can't find any GWT Modules on this page. code
Please ask on https://groups.google.com/d/forum/google-plugin-eclipse (or
on StackOverflow, as they moved their support there)
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:03:02 AM UTC+1, Nick Kloski wrote:
Hi all...I want to learn more about the Window Builder Pro plugin
to Eclipse and I am having
Yes I did compile my module with the xsiframe and devModeRedirectEnabled.
But it won't work.
And yes you ar right Web_CAM is my web app so I went to
localhost:/Web_CAM.html
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:39:36 AM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Did you compile your module once with
You can't.
Wouldn't it be great if loading a website (which could just be an ad
actually, so something that I didn't even *chose* to see) would load
Twitter in an hidden iframe, fill the compose input and then
programmatically click the Tweet button? (or variations along the way of
Facebook,
On the other hand, if you are loading iframe from the same domain, and have
full control of iframe content you can use window.postMessage api for child
- parent communication.
You will need to implement some JSNI methods in order to accomplish this in
GWT.
Best,
Milan
On Wednesday, February
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:07:48 PM UTC+1, Milan Cvejic wrote:
On the other hand, if you are loading iframe from the same domain, and
have full control of iframe content you can use window.postMessage api for
child - parent communication.
If it's from the same origin, you don't
I'm running into an issue where RequestFactory isn't calling the correct
setter on the domain object in DevMode and I've not tried it compiled yet.
Looking at the code it appears that ReflectiveServiceLayer.getBeanMethod is
just picking the first setter it finds based on SET/SET_BUILDER, are only
I still ... months later ... have to remove GWT Plugin version 1.0.11338
several times daily and replace it with a reliable old version (9738). This
is because 11338 crashes - will not load into Chrome 25.0.1364.97 m. To say
this is aggravating is an understatement. Suggestions?
On Fri, Jan 4,
will do, thanks!
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:40:58 AM UTC-8, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Please ask on https://groups.google.com/d/forum/google-plugin-eclipse (or
on StackOverflow, as they moved their support there)
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:03:02 AM UTC+1, Nick Kloski wrote:
Hi
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:05:30 PM UTC+1, James Horsley wrote:
I'm running into an issue where RequestFactory isn't calling the correct
setter on the domain object in DevMode and I've not tried it compiled yet.
Looking at the code it appears that
Thanks Thomas for clarification of messaging api. I believed that it is
working only on same domain and that it is build just to standardize
communication.
Best,
Milan
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:07:48 PM UTC+1,
Thanks for the quick and detailed reply.
Given a big win using RequestFactory is having it work well with existing
server side data models it'd seem like something we'd want to fix, relative
to other priorities of course. In this specifc case I don't own the domain
class as it's from a 3rd party
Issue filed
https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8039
On 27 February 2013 17:04, James Horsley james.hors...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the quick and detailed reply.
Given a big win using RequestFactory is having it work well with existing
server side data models
Hey,
even if this is a pretty old post, I had the same problem.
I used to fix it this way:
resizeImage.addMouseDownHandler(new MouseDownHandler(){
public void onMouseDown(MouseDownEvent event) {
event.preventDefault();
}
Please uninstall and reinstall from the Chrome store to get the latest
version (11357).
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:22 AM, David Briney david.bri...@gmail.comwrote:
I still ... months later ... have to remove GWT Plugin version 1.0.11338
several times daily and replace it with a reliable old
Why don't the automatic updates install 11357? I can attest, hundreds of
times over, that the auto updates install 11338. And 11338 has issues.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote:
Please uninstall and reinstall from the Chrome store to get the latest
I ended up with a solution where I in the GWT server implementation convert
the Entity Bean class to a plain POJO that implements IsSerializable.
Not the nicest solution :)
Kris
On Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:33:20 PM UTC-8, Kris wrote:
I have a maven project consisting of a parent
Here is a blog post I wrote on getting the code server running with the
Elemental library. You might find stuff in it that is useful.
http://lumpofcode.blogspot.com/2012/11/configuring-gwt-codeserver-and.html
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:09:59 AM UTC-8, Dominic Warzok wrote:
Hey I try
Hi,
I am using GWT 2.5.0.
I have a FormPanel that has several normal form widgets. I have a custom
widget that extends Composite and implements HasName and HasValueString.
All the setters and getters are implemented. However, when the form is
submitted it does not seem to recognized the
Yes, you loose alot of extensiblity with that, but it is a very stable
solution though. Also can be a little restricting when you start dealing
with nested DAO objects
kara
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Kris kli...@gmail.com wrote:
I ended up with a solution where I in the GWT server
See
https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/efc1e5e3b7853cac/0d745bfee422f8eb
2013/2/27 emurmur emur...@conceptuamath.com
Here is a blog post I wrote on getting the code server running with the
Elemental library. You might find stuff in it that is useful.
Brian Slesinsky has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2020
Change subject: Remove unnecessary wrapping of IOException in
DiskCacheToken. This just increases stack trace verbosity, since the
callers either throw IOException already or could easily do
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Remove unnecessary wrapping of IOException in
DiskCacheToken. This just increases stack trace verbosity, since the
callers either throw IOException already or could easily do so.
Goktug Gokdogan has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2030
Change subject: Removes deprecated methods from JUnitShell.
..
Removes deprecated methods from JUnitShell.
Change-Id:
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Removes deprecated methods from JUnitShell.
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2030
To unsubscribe, visit
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Remove unnecessary wrapping of IOException in
DiskCacheToken. This just increases stack trace verbosity, since the
callers either throw IOException already or could easily do so.
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2031
Change subject: Fix SpeedTracer Log when compilation is spread across
different processes.
..
Fix SpeedTracer Log when
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Fix SpeedTracer Log when compilation is spread across
different processes.
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
Seems to make sense to me.
--
To view, visit
Why protected? Also, shouldn't the unit tests be updated?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1891804/
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit Contributors group.
To
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1891804/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Animation.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Animation.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1891804/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Animation.java#newcode203
On 2013/02/28 01:45:15, jtam wrote:
Switched to Public. Not sure what you would like me to do in terms of
unit
tests. This is just exposing an internal which should be already
tested.
I think just adding appropriate asserts for isRunning()'s return value
to AnimationTest would be sufficient.
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Fix SpeedTracer Log when compilation is spread across
different processes.
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
Sure, makes sense.
--
To view, visit
Roberto Lublinerman has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Fix SpeedTracer Log when compilation is spread across
different processes.
..
Abandoned
Submitted, Thanks!
--
To view, visit
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1891804/diff/7001/user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Animation.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/animation/client/Animation.java (right):
39 matches
Mail list logo
