GWT dev plugin doesn't work in Firefox 23 under fedora 19 x86. It shows
always Missing Plugin, you can install plugin again and again. It does'nt
work... Any idea ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
Mouse-over on IE is also rather slow in compiled mode ( I see a lag of
about 500ms on my cell tables, nothing dramatic but still). I used to have
this problem in my own table implementation and I fixed it there by just
changing the color of the row directly instead of adding/removing
It runs the DevMode main class, ture.
But I am quite certain mvn gwt:run is fueling me the compiled javascript.
The project compilation time is huge for making the gecko_1_3 and safari
permutations (since I am testing in both chrome and firefox).
What would be the point of compiling all that java
Hi Thad, thanks for responding. Currently, I tried using OpenCSV, and had
successfully create a CSV file when I click the export button, but the CSV
file was empty. Do you meant that I could use Apache Commons instead of
OpenCSV?
On Thursday, August 8, 2013 10:27:06 PM UTC+8, Thad Humphries
Dear folks,
I have been a heavy GWT user for the past 4 years in a number of
projects. I have used M-GWT and it is great as well. Even though, I like
GWT/M-GWT, I dislike the usage of GWT RPC's. RESTFUL webservices
integration is the way to go so that the server side can be anything
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rafiq Ahamed ra...@eitworks.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
Any thoughts on DropWizard framework (http://dropwizard.codahale.com/)
as a backend for GWT. RESTFUL webservices is the way to go and I feel GWT
RPC is an Anti-Pattern.
GWT RPC was never intended to be
I did do some profiling and at the time it looked like a good 40% was spent
in the JDT. It will depend on the app though; I'm not satisfied I
understand the performance.
I've built some infrastructure for collecting better performance metrics
inside Google, but at the moment I've put that aside
Even though the current form is pretty flexible and you can mix and match
the two, it doesn't mean it makes sense to do so. I'm having hard time
thinking about out a good use case that would make a single complex mix and
match more appealing than having a separate group of class replacements and
a
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com wrote:
Even though the current form is pretty flexible and you can mix and match
the two, it doesn't mean it makes sense to do so. I'm having hard time
thinking about out a good use case that would make a single complex mix and
APT is missing mostly whole-world kind of informations in TypeOracle (e.g.
getAllSubTypes) but perhaps this is also advantage and that is why it help
the compiler to scale better :) Also looking at the usages
of getAllSubTypes it is not like a major deal if we replace GWT-RPC with
something that
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com wrote:
I think in the long-run we should separate the two concepts that is being
tackled by GWT.create today.
First purpose is the class replacement,
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote:
2. IDE support: IDE can trigger codegen (esp. for debugging)
My experience with this has been pretty poor, and running GWT with -gen
is at least as useful.
Also, Super Dev Mode gives you access to all the
Today, even GWT generator developers are having trouble debugging generated
code with -gen (just think GWTTestCase). It is not very practical for every
day usage of end users.
I don't know how well APT support of IDEs are today but that's something
that IDE's itself can improve upon and we can
13 matches
Mail list logo
