Hi all,
I'am working on the Injection framework of PWT, it's gonna be awesome.
But actually I am facing a big question:
Is there any way to rebind with a generator a class without implementing
any interface or extending any parent class?
My goal is to rebind classes containing some annotions,
I'am working on the Injection framework of PWT, it's gonna be awesome.
How can it be more awesome than Dagger 2.0 or Gin?
But actually I am facing a big question:
Is there any way to rebind with a generator a class without implementing
any interface or extending any parent class?
At
On Monday, September 1, 2014 5:04:24 PM UTC+2, Fabien Dumay wrote:
Hi all,
I'am working on the Injection framework of PWT, it's gonna be awesome.
But actually I am facing a big question:
Is there any way to rebind with a generator a class without implementing
any interface or extending
Den 01/09/2014 15.14 skrev google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com:
google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digestutm_medium=email/#!forum/google-web-toolkit/topics
Google
Groups
I am getting the following error please help me out, Thanks in Advance...
[ERROR] [crequestfactory] - Line 17: No source code is available for type
com.request.server.EmployeeRequestFactory; did you forget to inherit a
required module?
[ERROR] [crequestfactory] - Unable to find type
Thank you Jens, Thank you Thomas,
Début du message réexpédié :
De: Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com
Objet: Rép : Rebind / Generate from annotations
Date: 1 septembre 2014 17:21:12 UTC+2
À: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Répondre à: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
I'am working on
Hi all,
I am also facing the same problem. I am stuck at the same place where my
gwt app is not crawling even after applying all the code as described in
https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/.
Please help me with some code or link
On Friday, March 30, 2012 10:01:56 PM
can you please tell us how did you solved it , because i am also facing
same problem
On Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:40:31 PM UTC+5, akvarelli wrote:
Hi,
I already solved the problem myself, so no need to answer this subject
I posted a moment ago!
--
You received this message because
Hi Ivan,
why would you want to edit the JavaScript instead of editing your Java code?
How long does your compile take with the current GWT 2.7 Snapshot?
-Daniel
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ivan Markov ivan.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
(Background: I'm trying to further shorten the
Daniel,
I'm not planning to edit the generated JavaScript by hand. My idea is to
remove the need to do webapp *reloading*. The problem with reloading the
webapp is NOT that it takes a lot of time (it probably doesn't), but that
if the webapp is a stateful one, reloading it on each SDM
Ray,
Using the xs linker seems like a bad idea, as it combines the disadvantages
of sso and the xsiframe: :)
(a) Like xsiframe, it injects script tags in the document body via
JavaScript, which makes these script tags uneditable via Chrome LiveEdit
(b) Like sso, it uses the Module Pattern to
Thanks to all of you who participated to this very good things !
I am now able (from the trunk) to have a great experience debugging with
Gwt + Eclipse + Sdbg + Chrome.
I cannot be quantitatively very precise but the latest optimization
(-XcompilePerFile) seems to give good results. My project
Hi Arnaud,
are those 10s after the changes we made or before?
-Daniel
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all of you who participated to this very good things !
I am now able (from the trunk) to have a great experience debugging with
Gwt +
Basically the compile took 10s before and 9s now, but this is a very tiny
project, so that's why i am saying the improvement is here but not
quantitatively measurable on my particular project. I will send better
stats when working with bigger projects.
Thanks
Arnuad
2014-09-01 12:25 GMT+02:00
Hi guys,
I have just tried out the 2.7-SNAPSHOT. I have a fairly large multi-module
maven project.
For development, I am using STS 3.6, windows7, SSD, i7 3720qm 2.6Ghz,
Starting SuperDevmode:
Unification traversed 147422 fields and methods and 11825 types. 11773 are
considered part of the
Hi,
I would like to test new compile per file option, but we run our project
from Eclipse and we don't use Maven. So I have perform the following steps :
1) Download JAR files
from
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/google-snapshots/com/google/gwt/
gwt-servlet.jar
gwt-user.jar
For now, I can run my app in Eclipse hosted mode with GWT 2.6.1 and run SDM
server with GWT 2.7 snaphost. It look nothing has change in GWT-RPC
protocol so it is working.
Regards,
Matic
On Monday, September 1, 2014 3:09:18 PM UTC+2, Matic Petek wrote:
Hi,
I would like to test new compile
you could try changing line 182 in Recompiler.java to register the std
linker
https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt.git/+/2.5.1/dev/codeserver/java/com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/Recompiler.java
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Ivan Markov ivan.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ray,
Using the xs linker seems
err, in master that would be
https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt.git/+/master/dev/codeserver/java/com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/Recompiler.java
and line 327
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:58 PM, John Stalcup stal...@google.com wrote:
you could try changing line 182 in Recompiler.java to register the
Such a small time makes me think that you have particularly slow linkers.
What's the time split between compiling and linking?
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically the compile took 10s before and 9s now, but this is a very tiny
project, so that's
20 matches
Mail list logo
