Hi,
We are building our one GUI component, which are "basic HTML + CSS3 +
GQuery". We want this technology to be compatible with GWT 3.0 (base on
current informations). Because basic HTML is only DIV structure + img /
input, we are search for simple html template builder.
And ElementBuilderF
Hi,
Chrome 49 enabled lots of ES6 features,
see: http://v8project.blogspot.de/2016/01/v8-release-49.html
Part of this is the so called sloppy function hosting.
A simple example:
ES5 (old semantics)
ES2015 (new semantics)
Code
try {
function foo() {
foo=function(){};
console.log('
Thanks so much for the response! You say "all modern versions of GWT". I
don't suppose you can be more specific? The 2.8 version hasn't been
released yet and we can't upgrade to pre-release versions. We can probably
give the beta version a try just to see if it does fix our problem. Is this
pro
About production issue: Are you sure about this? It's less likely to happen
in production since many clinit calls will have been stripped by the
compiler, but its probably still going to happen.
About development: Is there actually a global try catch in your code or is
this even something else?
Hi,
I am having an issue where my nocache.js file timestamp seems to be locked
to the GWT.xml module file timestamp.
So it is difficult to see changes when the app is deployed.
I am using the GWT plugin for eclipse, with GWT 2.7.2.0
I noticed there was a bug fix for this in the GWT project.
Is
This is a known problem for 2.7
I think it is fixed for 2.8
https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/9108
So far I am touching the nocache.js after deployment as a workaround
(otherwise all clients have to to Shift+Reload to get the changes and then
there is the fun with the different caching be
Bump. Anyone?
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 4:01:05 PM UTC-4, Michael Zhou wrote:
>
> Is there a way to force GWT to output JS that is in ECMAScript 5 strict
> mode (ie. with the "use strict;" directive)?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users"
Back in the days as I remember, I overrid linker for that so it wraps gwt
code in aanonymous function call and inserts "use strict;" into it
Something like that: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/7710
On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 12:25:33 AM UTC+3, Michael Zhou wrote:
>
> Bump. Anyone?
>
Thanks. Do you plan to pick up that change?
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 5:38:37 PM UTC-4, Andrei Korzhevskii wrote:
>
> Back in the days as I remember, I overrid linker for that so it wraps gwt
> code in aanonymous function call and inserts "use strict;" into it
> Something like that: https:/
