@James: I am interested and may be able to help if you open source it.
However, there are integration issues with respect to GWT 3 noted above, in
the rest of the thread. Please do read it when you have time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Have not read the whole thread yet, but just wanted to point out a few
small things.
First, whole-world compilations and transforms are something I've been
working on as a replacement for generator subsystem since I heard it was
dying a couple years ago.
I have a toy implementation working
Hi,
I also had this problem. Seems that it was not possible back then (October
2016). I don't believe it is possible now.
Here is my jsni workaround in case you find something useful
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit/Holpz8_ERD8
Vassilis
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at
default permutation for Chrome (safari) works perfectly for us under all
browsers (FF, EDGE, Chrome, Safari)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 6:00:20 PM UTC+2, Keshav Agarwal wrote:
>
> I have write code using GWT 2.6.1 and jdk1.5. It's working fine in
> Internet Explorer 5, 6 but it's throwing error in IE11 that 'attachEvent'
> object or method not found. When I search in code, then I found that
>
I have write code using GWT 2.6.1 and jdk1.5. It's working fine in
Internet Explorer 5, 6 but it's throwing error in IE11 that 'attachEvent'
object or method not found. When I search in code, then I found that
cache.html files contains attach event. And attach event not supported by
IE11.
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 3:41:13 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> It indeed does use and from gwt.xml files to
> subset/superset the compilation classpath, but it does *not* take the
> EntryPoint into consideration; not at that point.
> First generators are run and generate code, then
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 4:06:25 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> Open-sourcing j2cl takes time (see
> https://opensource.google.com/docs/releasing/ , we've been told it's
> currently in the "getting approval" phase), more time than for
> jsinterop-generator or elemental2.
> But no
>
>
> My point is simply if the Java->JS compiler is moving to separate
> compilation,
>
Well, that is why we are having this discussion.
> having hooks in it cannot help you if the things you want require
> whole-world analysis.
>
It actually can, as I noted above, saving duplication of
Hi,
as you probably know, in plain JS methods like apply or call allow you to
pass any object for "this". Now, some JS libraries provide methods where
you can pass some callback function, which is performed after some
operation has finished. Some libraries choose to pass some special object
On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 9:57:35 PM UTC+2, Learner Evermore wrote:
>
> J2Cl will be a Google project (not a GWT project; actually not dissimilar
>> to how GWT currently leverages Eclipse JDT/ECJ, Jetty, etc.) but it'll be
>> open source and accept external contributions too.
>>
> I didn't
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 7:14:52 AM UTC+2, Learner Evermore wrote:
>
> ... continuing the above - there is more. Let's now come back to the
> analysis part. Yes, it is possible to do the "whole-world analysis" outside
> the compiler. But what perspective should the analysis take? It is
>
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Learner Evermore <
learner.everm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... continuing the above - there is more. Let's now come back to the
> analysis part. Yes, it is possible to do the "whole-world analysis" outside
> the compiler. But what perspective should the analysis
13 matches
Mail list logo
