Re: Best practises in automatic test and deployment

Mark, I would imagine the process you need to develop will dictate your tools. If you're just using InteliJ, you need to get Maven, Ant, or whatever building you project outside it first. That choice might dictate which app server you use to test. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Mark van Veen wr

Re: How to handle application state ?

Mittal, by "query", I believe Jeff means retrieve the user information from wherever you stored after the initial server retrieval: the cookie or the Session/Servlet state. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mittal wrote: > Yes, its application state for a "User". Why do I need to query server > in

Re: Dropping support for ie6?

-1 dropping ie6. Not aware how huge that customer base still is? It sux, but is what it is. On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Peter Ondruska wrote: > +1 for dropping ie6 > +1/2 for ie9 ;-) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit"

Re: Real-time app: best approach

400mb? :-) That would be a general design/implementation issue: not GWT specific. Regardless of frameworks, there needs to be paged requests from UI to server and server to Db. Play with request and cache sizes to get memory footprint -vs- performance balanced where you want. Good luck! On Fri

Re: gmail/facebook like chat -asp.net

Sorry, but, snicker. Good luck with that. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:00 PM, nacho wrote: > I think that there's betters places to ask what you need. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send em

Re: GWT & MVP

No offense to the other posters, but I wouldn't go anywhere near "platform" or "mvp4g" right off. Just confuses the issue. Having recently been where you're at, I'd go here first: http://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/uiArchs.html. That should shed more light on why MVP is of interest period. "Humble

Re: GWT & MVP

Nicely done, David. +1 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, David Chandler wrote: > Thanks for the vote of confidence, but let me suggest that some of the > confusion around MVP results from overloading the term (I bear some of the > blame here, sorry). > > Three key ideas of MVP proper are > 1. View

Re: GWT Developper plugin without internet connection

Actually, I'm in the same boat, so a clear "how to" would rock. As a contractor, it's rare that I could "just download" something. More often it's a case of sending some group representative a url, they download, virus check, security check, check-check, then if it passes, copy it out to a networ

Re: Book that covers latest GWT release

I picked up the most from using GWT Designer (Windows Builder or something back "then") with MyEclipse, but I had a clue about UI programming with OOP languages (not saying you don't, btw :-). The GWT wiki was a fantastic reference by itself, but I also found "Google Web Toolkit Applications" by R

Re: MVP vs PureMVC

http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/6a47d4ac1bb9a3b3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM Hope those url's work, if you hav

Re: Re : Re: Client/Server serialization/deserialization for using Hibernate with GWT

+1. Top of my wish list. No offense Devs, but RequestFactory requires too much scaffolding chaff. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe f

Re: Pros & Cons for RequestFactory Vs GWT RPC mechanism

That's a little misleading in that RequestFactory useage requires a considerable amount of scaffolding code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google

Re: Pros & Cons for RequestFactory Vs GWT RPC mechanism

After digging into both, I'm moving towards GWTEventservice: http://code.google.com/p/gwteventservice/. RequestFactory seems best fitted to CRUD operations on specific model entities and does offer much "under the covers" in supporting those operations. Combined with UIBinder and Editors, it's