>
> GWT first optimizes the Java AST, then converts it into a JavaScript AST
> and optimizes it as well.
>
I had a sneaking suspicion the obfuscation might not be working off
human-readable JS. Neat.
Once that is done the actual obfuscation is just a simple renaming as far
> as I know.
>
A
>
> On Thursday, June 30, 2016 at 11:36:19 AM UTC+2, Jens wrote:
>>
>> GWT first optimizes the Java AST, then converts it into a JavaScript AST
>> and optimizes it as well. Once that is done the actual obfuscation is just
>> a simple renaming as far as I know.
>>
>
> Once the optimization (aka t
ipt and have it
obfuscate that, or does it only work on GWT-generated code?
- David Lindsay
PS. As an aside, I'm very curious why so many of the functions I see are
empty. Is there a reason for this? Why can't eg 527 empty functions (with
no arguments) be turned into 1? Are they
