Want to also mentioned here that following changes are needed if one
opt to fully migrate away from the old package to the new bindery
package:
web.xml
requestFactory
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.server.RequestFactoryServlet
GWT's *.gwt.xml
It worked!!! Thank you very much Raphael and David. I was looking at
that exact thread before but wasn't careful enough to pickup the
sources to include the source. Never know
maven even has that.
Thanks guys.
Joseph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hi all,
I am still getting some weird error in my project even after:
1.) convert all references of --com.google.gwt.requestfactory.shared--
TO --com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared--.
2.) convert all references of --com.google.gwt.requestfactory.client--
TO --com.google.web.bindery.reque
I did, but still getting error. Flipping it back to GWT 2.2.0 and
things went back to normal. Will try to search around codehaus then.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web
I am using a Roo+gwt generated project pom.xml. All I did was flip the
GWT version from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0 and all hell breaks lose. Anyone
getting similar error?
[com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser
$Impl.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:355),
com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.ac
Thank you Sowdri,
Looking at the issue opened and the notes associated with it. It might
not solve the things that I want to do entirely. Having the
EditTextCell workable seems to be part of the solution. Another part
would require gutting the CellTable to work with the editor driver
correctly, si
Thank you for the reply Thomas,
No, I didn't create a valueProxy for that Range class. Thinking that I
probably don't need one since the param is going one direction from
the client back to the server as parameter only and not included in
any return object. I probably go for ur suggestions to crea
This is probably a silly question. I tried using Range in one of the
finder method for a domain class that retrieve info via RequestFactory
+RequestContext framework. The finder would compile and work without
problem if the range given is listed as two separate int. However, it
would fail on startu
While testing own CellTable widget in my pet project, and painfully
going thru initializing the Column with EditTextCell together with
hand coded getters and updaters. I can't help but thinking it would be
really nice if I can just drop the editor & driver framework directly
to the cellTable, and w
hi Adib,
u might want to take a look at Spring Roo. The scaffolding might not
be very extensible... but the resulting pom.xml and the project setup
resulted from the simple gwt setup command is priceless imho. And it
really help to have something working so u can put a break point on
the app to s
A limitation of GAE, bottom of the page indicated JNDI lookup is not
supported: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/webxml.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-
hi Thomas,
Any plans on getting similar checks that performed by
RequestFactoryInterfaceValidator to the Eclipse plugin so it will show
it immediately there is an error and possibly offered a suggestion
right there thru Ctrl-1?
Thanks,
Joseph
--
You received this message because you are subscr
+1 on this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
Good to know client side bean validation is a work in progress, that
explains why it isn't working yet currently.
Thanks David,
Joseph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit
Colin,
Thanks for your reply. I understand from the source that the ValueBox
and the DateBox are from two totally separate branches so it might not
be possible to make the existing DateBox fits into the
ValueboxEditorDecorator bunch. But as a user, if Google is pushing
the uiBinder, the requestFa
opened an issue in the tracker, figured the GWT team can close it if
they have other plans:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6107
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send emai
Trying to use DateBox with ValueBoxEditorDecorator in uiBinder
thinking I could take advantage of the error reporting. But
unfortunately they can't be used together and at runtime it gives the
following error when I bring up the form:
[ERROR] [sandbox] - Line 50: The method setValueBox(Val
I found this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/aa022f56d9c837db/65c27dbba8927ab9?lnk=gst&q=Proxy+default+values#65c27dbba8927ab9
The solution requires a trip back to the server to create the object
with initialization then pass it back to the client thr
Entity proxies created via requestContext.create(...) does not have
the correct default value defined in the real entity class, anyone how
to easily get around that without manually setting it before passing
it to the driver.edit(...)?
Thanks,
Joseph
--
You received this message because you are
It might be an overkill, but the Spring Roo + GWT integration has a
nice Maven build that is quite handy. Just follow some tutorial to
setup a Roo project with GWT. Then wipe the generated code out and u
will have yourself a fully cooked Maven build with AspectJ, Spring,
Hibernate and Gin setup.
J
Update: re-enabling the level 2 cache and force loading the
relationship within the transactional finder method doesn't solve the
problem. So back to the initial solution to disable the level 2
cache.
Would appreciate if anyone have any insight on the problem.
Thanks,
Joseph
--
You received th
I have the following two simple classes:
@Entity
class Employee {
DateRange effectiveDateRange;
.
}
@Embeddable
@EmbeddedOnly
class DateRange {
Date startDate;
Date endDate;
}
The first time the app start up and went thru a finder method on the
Employee class, t
For some reason I am getting duplicate values from
myEditorDriver.getPath(). It would list most of the fields twice. I
say "most" fields because I am having problem trying to see why the
sub-editor is not picking up the fields in the embeddable object and
it happens that the field that holds the em
hi Pete,
I am not an html / css, but from what I read, u might want to switch
to using css' margin-left and margin-right properties for better
layout control.
Joseph
On Feb 18, 10:43 pm, pete wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I have a weird problem, in my UiBinder template (suppose it's the
> template for
Thanks Thomas for taking the time to open a ticket and responded so
quickly.
Thanks again.
Joseph
On Feb 18, 7:32 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Had the very same thoughts, so I opened an
> issue:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6046
>
> I can only tell you that it *was
I am thinking more likely the RequestFactory is rendering optimistic
locking useless. The project is created with Roo with DataNucleus &
GWT. I wiped out all the generated stuff out and use the resulting
Maven build as a starting point. I have been able to get a simple
entity going and have a simp
Thanks Thomas.
Now I know what I will be majoring in if I got time for another
degree, under water basket weaving sounds like fun.
Joseph
On Feb 12, 4:10 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Have a look at the DynaTableRf sample.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
To GWT team,
downloaded 2.2.0 and read the devguide,but it would be nice to have
some working example to play with to see how it all works.
Thanks,
Joseph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send emai
t when
> > you download the sdk
>
> > On Feb 11, 10:12 pm, JosephLi wrote:
>
> > > To my surprise I refreshed the dev guide page and it says GWT 2.2, I
> > > thought my eyes was playing tricks on me after a long day's work.
> > > Refreshed it again an
To my surprise I refreshed the dev guide page and it says GWT 2.2, I
thought my eyes was playing tricks on me after a long day's work.
Refreshed it again and indeed it says 2.2. And the SDK download link
gets me the new version as well. Good job GWT Team and thanks for the
frequent release.
Thanks
hi Joao,
You might want to take a look at the questions posts in the Roo forum
(http://forum.springsource.org/forumdisplay.php?f=67) to decide for
yourself.
But form my limited experience with it so far on my testing project, I
would not want to plan on using Roo+GWT on real projects yet.
Joseph
I would say better not go the Roo+GWT route for any real project
unless u have time to burn and like a challenge. Roo is at version
1.1.1, but I would say their GWT integration is still in beta at best.
U can get a bare bone GWT site running in no time with scaffolding but
to start customizing is t
inder available through requestFactory.request?
Thanks in advance,
Joseph
On Dec 9, 2:07 am, JosephLi wrote:
> I have been trying to hack around to customize a GWT + Roo test
> project and so far from my very primitive customized gui, I can call
> the simple count, findById methods without
I have been trying to hack around to customize a GWT + Roo test
project and so far from my very primitive customized gui, I can call
the simple count, findById methods without problem. But I hit a road
block when I try to implement some simple search function by addition
a finder to the domain clas
Thank you Konstantin,
The open with "Windows Builder Editor" did the trick. I can now edit
the gui graphically and easily work with event handlers without
jumping between two files.
Thanks,
Joseph
On Dec 2, 8:22 am, Konstantin Scheglov
wrote:
> Hi, I'm author of GWT Designer. ;-)
>
> > ** no
But know this, if you choose to build your Ui in
> Java without any Ui designer, it'll be a lot mor cumbersome than using
> UiBinder.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:56 AM, JosephLi wrote:
> > Also about the jav
Also about the java editor highlighting the uifields in the editor
indicating that they are not found in the associated ui.xml file. I
verified that it only happens to projects created with Spring Roo. It
is not a problem if the project is created thru Eclipse.
Joseph
--
You received this messag
>
> Well to me, it feels right. It feels web. Have you ever took a look into
> MXML ? XAML ? Well, declarative Ui style is the modern way to write Ui and
> with Gwt Designer getting better and better every day, there's no reason to
> back off from learning how to use UiBinder.
&
Hi Jeff,
Is there some special tools u are using to build utilize the UiBinder
way to easily build gui?
I tried it, but I also tried Google's latest offering on the Window's
Builder, which in gives me the impression that it is way more
efficient to build gui with. The tools directly support event
If anyone encountered some weird behavior trying to download and run
the Contacts2 example from (http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/articles/
mvp-architecture-2.html) and is having the following symptoms, I have
the solutions for u:
1.) adding new contact sometimes causes other contacts to disappe
Thank you guys for all the insight. As Sean and Thomas pointed out, I
do believe that being able to junit test the "P" is a good idea and
thats what drawn me to look at the MVP-2. It was only after looking at
the example and realized that it took so much effort to it and make me
think it might be c
hi all,
I am trying to follow along whats in "http://code.google.com/
webtoolkit/articles/mvp-architecture-2.html" and I am just thinking
that
it requires too many classes and generics to construct a simple CRUD
app for a single
entity? I am posting this just to see if anyone feels the same
towar
Not sure if my GWT Eclipse plugin is older version, but it seems to
work for me on STS 2.3.3.M1. And I install the GWT plugin via "http://
dl.google.com/eclipse/plugin/3.5". I can create GWT project directly
from STS and it runs without problem. I was able to follow and finish
the StockWatcher tuto
hi all,
I am trying to follow along the whats in "http://code.google.com/
webtoolkit/articles/mvp-architecture-2.html", however the code that I
downloaded from that same page doesn't match what is being shown on
the page. It contains the same set of class and the methods does the
roughly the same
I didn't find a solution to my problem. But after looking more into
the tutorial and the MVP pattern that we should be using with GWT
helps building plain Junit test cases, I don't think I be needing
GWTTestCase in near future.
Joseph
On Jun 26, 1:44 pm, JosephLi wrote:
> I se
I searched on the forum and I see people asking similar question but
it was a while back using GWT1.6. I am now using gwt-2.1.0.M1 with STS.
2.3.3M1 and I am getting the following error when I tries to run the
StockWatcherTest, I even tries to create the Foo sample apps from
command line with -juni
46 matches
Mail list logo
