Well, my own wishlist includes Issue #1032,
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1032. It
only effects Maven users, and is somewhat mitigated by the GWT maven
plugin, but it is an annoyance because GWT unit tests cannot run
inside of the standard maven test harness, which i
On Oct 29, 6:29 am, lkcl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rummikub has 110 images loaded onto the page. firefox takes about 5-8
> seconds to add all the tokens, one-by-one with javascript (compiled
> from python of course). pyjamas-desktop, usingwebkit, takes about 2
> seconds. the javascript is g
I think what we're really thinking about doing is preserving IE8 for the
existing gwt widget stuff, but any features (APIs) we add going forward are
going to leverage modern browser stuff, and we are not going to design
(poorly performing, hacky) fallback/polyfill workarounds.
For GWT 3.0, we
; In addition, do you know if there will be significant changes to UiBinder?
>
> Tim
>
> On Oct 25, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Ray Cromwell >
> wrote:
>
>
> I think what we're really thinking about doing is preserving IE8 for the
> existing gwt widget stuff, but any feat
Over the past year, the GWT team did lose some people (Ray Ryan/Bob
Vawter), some moved to other projects, and some recently left for a startup
(Bruce/Joel/Kelly). One of our team members went for maternity leave, as a
result, we didn't have enough resources to simultaneously focus on the
exte
If I told you the number of monthly active GWT developers, I think you
would be quite impressed. A hangout sounds like a good idea, I will look
into setting one up soon.
-Ray
On Friday, April 20, 2012 4:15:27 PM UTC-7, Joshua Kappon wrote:
>
> Thanks for commenting Ray (and also for keeping u
JsInterop is only half implemented and not for use right now. There are
several big patches that are going to land soon which change a lot about
it. I would hold off using it until then.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:24 AM, 田传武 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried converted two projects we are currently usi
