> wouldn't the security constraint container be available to a
> DOM inspector for analysis? some kind of a BIG HOLE in security?
Yes. And it is also trivial to take your obfuscated code and de-obfuscate
it. So assume that anyone that can download your JavaScript code can read
it and change it a
> The only thing i have to do is to unzip the GWT SDK 2.3 and re-compile
> my application ?
Yes.
Note that you may get some errors that you need to fix due to API changes.
Rob
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:14 PM, omae...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have developed a GWT application in version
At the end of the day, its just JavaScript, which means you get the same
communication that you would with JavaScript (i.e. XHR).
There are lots of ways to implement it though. Even though the transport
mechanism is the same you could use GWT-RPC, RequestFactory, RequestBuilder,
or JSONP. If you
> Can't I simply create module libraries and call them from my main app
Yes, you can, assume all you need to do is create a single compilation
unit. But that doesn't address any communication issues between clients and
client-server.
Also, instead of doing it like you have, maybe consider multip
Awesome, thanks everyone for the ideas.
Rob
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On 8 juil, 18:53, Robert Hanson wrote:
> > Based on the docs for FormPanel the server has to reply with the
> > content-type of text/html, otherwise there ma
Based on the docs for FormPanel the server has to reply with the
content-type of text/html, otherwise there may be issues with some
browsers. But if you do that, and send XML content it seems it has browser
issues.
For example, in FF/DevMode the SubmitCompleteEventHandler returns null for
the res
onths I think
before they were able to do so. It will get there.
Rob
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Gal Dolber wrote:
> This is right, what we really need is Google to open source the plugin, but
> they don't want to
>
> 2010/7/4 Robert Hanson
>
>> The plugin
The plugin is great, but every time I create a new application I need to go
through the project and delete all of the example code. Perhaps there can
be an option on the new project dialog that lets you turn off the sample
code, and only created the entry point, module config, and a deployment
des
I haven't posted here in a while, but I need some help.
A few of us (Ian Bambury, Chris Ramsdale, Adam Tacy, and me) are working on
a book for Manning, and we are a bit short on reviewers. So there is anyone
interested in doing a book review, we could use the help. The amount of
experience with
There is also an about.txt[html] with the GWT distribution.
Here are the notable bits:
| This product includes software developed by:
| - The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
|- Tomcat (http://tomcat.apache.org/) with modifications
|- Tapestry (http://tapestry.apache
> If I do so, the rpc services in HelloWorld do not work anymore.
You just need to set the target URL of the remote services properly,
and that is dependent on your setup.
1) For example, perhaps you can use an absolute URL:
/parth/to/servlet
2) Or relative to the JS code.
GWT.getModuleBase
You could write a small native JS method that substitutes "&" and for
"&", and "<" for "<". Typically that is all that you would
need to make the char data XML compliant.
Rob
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Manish Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using HTMLEditor to enter some
You can't use non-GWT libs in a GWT project*.
GWT ships with a VERY limited JRE, and compiles Java source to JS
source. The lib you are trying to use (1) uses parts of the JRE that
GWT does not support, and (2) does not have the Java source code
included in the jar file.
You will need to use th
Well, the RPC could return the URL of an image. You could create the
image on the file system with some random name, and return that URL to
the browser. If a random name isn't secure enough, you could use a
servlet filter or other non-GWT technology to only allow that use to
access that particul
14 matches
Mail list logo
