I'm trying to do this:
public interface Alert {
public ArrayList getOtherAlerts();
}
Client Code:
public class JSAlert extends JavaScriptObject implements Alert {
public final native ArrayList getOtherAlerts() /*-{
return this.alerts;
}-*/;
}
another class:
public void onModuleLoa
Question.. if I have an interface:
public MyInterface {
ArrayList getSomethings();
}
Then on the client I implement:
public JSMyInterface extends JavascriptObject implements MyInterface {
private ArrayList mySomethings;
public ArrayList getSomethings() {
return mySomethings;
ts to the
> ArrayList. This is beacuse there is now way to now that it is an ArrayList
> when you using eval. But I could be wrong.
>
> 2010/1/24 Roger Studner
> Question.. if I have an interface:
>
> public MyInterface {
> ArrayList getSomethings();
> }
>
> T
I've found after (far too many) years of engineering software, that consistency
is far better than dogma.
It is incredibly rare that a design pattern, taken off the shelf and dusted,
works for every case.
In your case, if you have a reason to create the view via the presenter, I
wouldn't fear
And to add one thing.
Using JSON w/ GWT is well.. "awful".
The main reason for this, is that you get JSON back to the client, and either
use Overlay Types (can't use instanceof with there, and about 500 other
issues).. or you hve to take a "simple" OverlayType and then re-instantiate all
of yo
lready existing application, so
>> I need to hook something in between the service side application & GWT to
>> communicate, so I am looking out if it should be json or xml.
>>
>>
>> - Abdullah
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Roger Studner &
GWT application, the communication with server part is
>> pending, the server side is java but its an already existing application, so
>> I need to hook something in between the service side application & GWT to
>> communicate, so I am looking out if it should be jso
Anyone have experience with mixing these two beasts?
I have a GWT 1.5.3 based project that is using GWT-EXT (the old,
free/opensource-ish versus that wrapped ExtJS).
I'm not talking about GXT or EXT-GWT (yes, I know, confusing names)
Roger
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
be a good idea use it with GWT 2.0. I don't know if it has some issue.
>
> Why don't you use SmartGWT or GXT?
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> On Jan 29, 11:09 am, Roger Studner wrote:
>> Anyone have experience with mixing these two beasts?
>>
>&g
How did you find the migration from GWT-EXT to GXT?
Do I basically just, well, "delete all my views" and start over :)?
Roger
On Jan 30, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Sorinel C wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> There you go -- I hope, here:
>
> http://ui-programming.blogspot.com/2010/01/comparation-ext-gwt-gxt-vs..
Begs the question (and I don't have time, sadly, to try it).
GWT 2.0 + ObjectifyWithGWT + (Gaelyk or Grails)
That would be an insanely awesome stack.
Roger
On Feb 12, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> A couple days ago the Objectify team released version 2.0 of
> Objectify-Appengine,
it pains me to say that the samples doesn't work in GOOGLE chrome heh
Roger
On Mar 3, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Sanjiv Jivan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Smart GWT 2.1 has just been released.
>
> Release announcement :
> http://www.jroller.com/sjivan/entry/smart_gwt_2_1_released
> Showcase with new samples : ht
; working for me.
>
> BTW - Love the new skin and the ability to add widgets to grid cells.
>
> On Mar 3, 8:55 am, Roger Studner wrote:
>> it pains me to say that the samples doesn't work in GOOGLE chrome heh
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2010, at 8:18 AM
work. I am using Chrome and all the samples are
> working for me.
>
> BTW - Love the new skin and the ability to add widgets to grid cells.
>
> On Mar 3, 8:55 am, Roger Studner wrote:
>> it pains me to say that the samples doesn't work in GOOGLE chrome heh
>>
&g
The only problem I found with this interface technique (which I immediately
wanted) was this:
public interface MyEntity {
List getNames();
}
The javascript overlay type has to deal in JSArray's, the server can't etc.
So for all lists/collections I found it broke down pretty quick
Roger
On
SmartGWT or ExtJS(gwt-ext, ext-gwt) etc.. all have this issue.
"I'd like one tiny tiny feature."
"here are your 1000+ files."
Thanks!
Roger
On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:22 PM, mk wrote:
> We have a tiny widget from SmartClient's SmartGwt. And it had
> increased the intial loadup size between webserv
The onKeyPress events.. when you check for a modifying (shift, control, if they
hit the enter key).
On OSX *all* of these report 0.
Thus, I mean, you can't really use onKeyPress to check for the ENTER key..
well.. ever ;)
Roger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
se you have to use KeyDown or KeyUp events for these :D
>
> I had to change my masked textbox for that when upgrading to gwt 2.1
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Roger Studner wrote:
> The onKeyPress events.. when you check for a modifying (shift, control, if
Why GWT scares me these days just a bit:
"I'd suggest waiting a bit (a few days, maybe even just hours) for the
2.1 RC1 release of GWT and use RequestFactory (you could go with the
current M3, but many things have changed since then, so starting with
RC1 would probably be better)."
Roger
On Oc
aying, "The new version broke X,Y,Z"
No worries though :)
Roger
On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On 7 oct, 19:42, Roger Studner wrote:
>> Why GWT scares me these days just a bit:
>>
>> "I'd suggest waiting a bit (a few days, ma
Well.. a quick bit of objective (having used all 3) opinions.
It is simple:
1) don't use GWT-EXT.
2) GXT is a "pure java" solution, and the only one of the 3.
3) SmartGWT is *really slick*, but it is basically a little java code, that
just "wraps" the SmartClient javascript library (imagine a cou
Everytime I try to do GWT Dev mode (gwt 2.1) with Chrome on OSX, it gives me
the "Failed to connect to server" error message
i've tried bindAddress 0.0.0.0 and a pile of other workarounds.
Anyone have this problem/success with this?
Note - works 100% of the time using firefox.. i'd just like to
When I try to start dev mode in firefox, things work perfectly.
When I try with Chrome, I get the "Failed to connect to server" and this
exception appears in the browser
(note, nothing shows up in the dev mode window etc)
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeM
Yeah, toolbox stays red/no permissions issue..
I did go ahead and add
localhost
localhost:9997
127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1:9997
etc
etc
before I figured there might just be a bug ;)
Roger
On Dec 22, 2010, at 10:17 AM, Chris Conroy wrote:
> Matthew: There is a plugin as of a few weeks ago.
>
> Roger
Certainly feels like this could be it
Roger
On Dec 22, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Chris Conroy wrote:
> just guessing, but you could be hitting a different manifestation of this
> bug: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5778
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:59 AM, R
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.run(BrowserChannelServer.java:352)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Roger Studner wrote:
> Yeah, toolbox stays red/no permissions issue..
>
> I did go ahead and ad
I'm trying to detect a checkbox selection "click" so I can do some other work
(enable a button/change some css.. trivial stuff)
I tried GWTQuery, which fails (I can bind a click handler to every checkbox..
but after 1 click, CellTable appears to remove my bindings hah)
I've tried overriding pil
If I do a single selection model etc.. (canonical).. I get a checkbox.
Technically, you'd think, this would render as a radio button..
Anyone experiment/discover how to replace the default check box column w/ a
radio button ?
thanks
Roger
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
As someone who uses GWT, but also knows HTML/CSS/jQuery… I will at least
honestly (flames expected) say that developing with GWT, while great for 'java
devs' is far slower and more painful than just doing traditional html/css/js
development (if you know what you are doing that is)
Roger
On Oct
jquery != problem with browser compatibility.
People will make sure jquery 'still works' *long after* Google stops working on
GWT and open sources it.
(Not good or bad, just obviously true)
Roger
On Oct 23, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Rori Stumpf wrote:
>
> I have a greater fear of having to use plain
There are many (many) jQuery based live grid implementations. They are far
easier to style, implement and customize than "CellTable"
A massive strength of GWT, is the ability to model your domain objects on the
client. Sure, you can do this in javascript using Backbone and other
techniques, bu
Don't use SmartGWT for anything.
Best,
Guy who has actually tried to use SmartGWT at more than 1 company (lots of
versions between attempts) and 100% of the time has had to rip it out.
On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:09 PM, sanika joshi wrote:
> Hi All,
> Wanted to know if smart GWT can be used for com
That is one awful looking website.
*eats popcorn*
On Apr 20, 2012, at 2:22 AM, Luc Claes wrote:
> The two GWT founders, Bruce Johnson and Joel Webber, have left Google and are
> creating a new startup:
> http://www.monetology.com/team
>
> On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:11:38 PM UTC+2, Supercobr
I believe there are a total of … "0".. sessions about GWT.
Roger
On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Travis Camechis wrote:
> One thing for sure is that the code base is still being actively developed if
> you look at the activity on the repository. It will be curious to see how
> much talk there wi
Agreed… right now the giant issue is Mozilla/Firefox.
If Firebug didn't exist, I imagine nobody would use Firefox anymore. It is
that simple.
Roger
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Paul Robinson wrote:
> On 30/04/12 15:23, Piergrossi, Mark J wrote:
>>
>> Alan:
>>
>> Just wanted to say thank y
Okay, losing my mind on something trivial.. if I have
public class FooBar {
public static native void methodA() /*-{
FooBar.methodB();
/*-};
public static native void methidB() /*-{
$wnd.alert("hi!");
/*-};
}
this should work? I feel like i've done it 1000
s more accurate (the fact that i'm trying to access it inside of a
function, which affects "scope" to some degree of course
Best,
Roger
On May 15, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Roger Studner wrote:
> Okay, losing my mind on something trivial.. if I have
>
> public class FooB
For some reason I was thinking/hoping that a "JSNI to JSNI call" wouldn't use
the evil syntax.
Thanks Thomas!
Roger
On May 15, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 4:39:48 PM UTC+2, Roger wrote:
> Okay, losing my mind on something trivial.. if I have
>
>
is thre any documentation out there, other than a really weak javadoc for the
ThreadPermutationWorkerFactory that describes what this is/why it works (or
doesn't) etc?
Roger
On May 19, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Edson Richter wrote:
> Sorry for answering my own question. I've found that I need to add t
There is a "wave" and a "buzz" about GWT I jus can't put my finger on.
Roger
On May 20, 2012, at 6:17 AM, Andrés Testi wrote:
> The session topic is "Migrating code from GWT to Dart"... sorry, but it
> scares me.
>
> - Andrés
>
> El domingo, 20 de mayo de 2012 07:09:11 UTC-3, dflorey escrib
I'm building an app that has a really good use case for me to have my own/raw
HTML Tables (I thought of flextable.. but the api pains me).
Anyway.. i'm trying to figure out something and am a bit stuck, thought "the
crowd" might have some ideas.
piece of code:
GQuery td = $("");
ThingyBarUIB
So, let me give my take on GWT (and add, I'm' happy).
I use GWT, UIBinder, and JavascriptOverlayObjects to handle my tempting, i8n
and client side business logic code (event bus, writing happy things like if
(account.isOpen()) etc)
I use 100% ajax calls to JSON endpoints.. I don't use gwt-rpc.
So i'd read up on having your PHP services produce JSON, and GWT's use of
RequestBuilder + JavascriptOverlayObjects. I've put plenty of GWT ui's on
front of rails, grails, php back ends etc.
TO note: I love javascript.. use it all the time for personal projects.. I just
happen to like the blen
I tend to just always start with an index.html, a reset.css & main.css, and a
kitchensink.js hah.. and at some point.. that grows.. and then, at some point,
I migrate it to a GWT structure when I feel all the application logic, event
bus handling etc warrants it.
I really like java package st
There is no such thing as "producing clean vs not clean" html unless you rely
on other peoples widgets.
100% of my widgets are a UIBTemplate.. of my creation… I use GWTQuery (or
jquery) to add/remove elements from my widgets. Thus, the HTML is exactly as
clean as any HTML that any non-gwt appl
It helps the most when highly talented html5/css3/jquery people produce mockups
etc.. as then translating them to GWT to get i8n, code splitting and a handy
way to do an event bus + business logic all in java, is pretty darn easy
Roger
On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
> The
46 matches
Mail list logo
