I would like to see some guidelines from the steering committee about
some sort of rubber stamping of contribution ideas long before the patch
process. The learning curve of setting up the GWT build and making a
patch is fairly expensive, and it makes sense for the GWT process to
Since my change causes so many test failures, it would be nice if I
could run the full build failing fast on the first test failure. Is this
possible?
This would help me determine the root cause of the other test failures.
Cheers,
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Most of the errors appear to be caused by UnableToCompleteException;
Exception in constructor: testGetMethods
(com.google.gwt.core.ext.UnableToCompleteException: (see previous log
entries)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDef.checkForSeedTypes(ModuleDef.java:1031)
at
Nevermind, it started passing, YEA!
I am not sure what changed, it could be the updated code (tools/trunk) that
someone checked in this morning that I pulled in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this
What are your OS and tools (java, ant, python, g++) versions?
Here are my versions, and a script to get them. Is there a good place to
check this script in, perhaps under tools?
Also it would be nice if we could echo the ANT_OPTS in the ant script,
since I set it to this in
Hi,
Ok I had issues with the ~/.netrc file, which never authenticated me.
So I removed it to get command line user/password dialogs which did this;
(Replaced my username as X)
[gwt@localhost trunk]$ git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master
Username for 'https://gwt.googlesource.com': X
Hi,
I don't see anywhere to 'sign' a agreement in the gerrit web interface,
I emailed it in per the instructions.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/settings/new-agreement
Cheers,
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors
Oh, looking at signing the individual agreement there electronically.
The Corporate Agreement is email only.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Ok that worked, you have to sign both agreements?
It seemed like a either or thing.
Cheers,
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hi,
I am having issues pushing my gwt-site change up;
To https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt-site
! [remote rejected] HEAD - refs/for/master (missing Change-Id in commit
message footer)
error: failed to push some refs to 'https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt-site'
[gwt@localhost gwt-site]$ ls -Al
Hi Thomas,
I don't think the corporate agreement ever gets turned on in Gerrit,
although I could be wrong.
I think this forces the individual to sign the agreement, to get Gerrit to
accept the change.
Although someone may have changed something to get my corporate
agreement to get
Thanks for the comments on various build systems. I have been scanning all
of their docs.
The strange thing I am noticing is that while they all allow concurrency,
it generally seems to be a after thought
for multiple projects. The buck facebook comment says 2x faster, however I
am thinking
Ok that worked, thanks!
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this
In a third permutation perhaps it needs both :)
Cheers,
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thanks for the build tools comments, I have a few questions.
Do any of these have source control (git/tag) support for building specific
versions (ie git clone, checkout)?
Do any of these use massive concurrency for the compiling/testing runs?
The legacy adligo.org build (in ant) did things
Hi,
Some other issues;
read
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9552/8/README.md
this worked
$ ant clean elemental dist
It might be nice to have the following on the ci server...
${uname -r}
3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64
${python -V}
Python 2.7.5
${gcc -v}
...
gcc version 4.8.2 20140120 (Red
Ok dev ant test is working :)
solved by the obvious
$ which ant
modify $PATH to the $ANT_HOME/bin/ant script
ANT_OPTS=-Xmx4g -XX:MaxPermSize=4g
quotes are important :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from
hmm I added the three classes LinkageError,
IncompatibleClassChangeError and NoSuchFieldError,
and got a large number of test failures
ie;
[junit] Running
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.gwt.RequestFactorySuite
[junit] Tests run: 182, Failures: 0, Errors: 182, Time elapsed:
Hi All,
Thanks for all of you replies, I will start looking at this again in a
few days. Also what build tools are you looking at?
Historically I have favored ant over maven because it is more flexible,
however I have spent a good chunk of the last week
thinking about writing a build system
Hi All,
I am trying to contribute NoSuchFieldError (and it's parent classes) to
GWT. I have not been able to get get the 'ant test' target to work, my
most recent attempt is getting a timeout after 5 hours :(
BUILD FAILED
/home/scott/gwt-src/trunk/build.xml:162: The following error
20 matches
Mail list logo
