Hi,
Read the log4j docs. Use a console apender.
On 31 dec., 11:39, Paul Grenyer wrote:
> HI
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:08 PM, leslie wrote:
> > Hi. I'm using Log4J with GWT 2.0 also. I'm building with Eclipse.
>
> > Inside the properties file, "log4J.properties", I've included a line
> > s
PS: list of objects also works in 1.6.
On Sep 25, 6:06 pm, mwaschkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick question about serialization:
>
> If I have something to be serialized with the following type defined:
>
> private List resultList
>
> gwt gives me a serialization error, but if I take away the
> t
I'm using list of serializables just fine (it only shows some warnings
since gwt 1.6) because my domain classes are not ready to inherit some
strange superclass just for gwt ser. to work. So I guess you're using
1.5 or lower.
On Sep 25, 6:06 pm, mwaschkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick question about
Maybe adding the jars to sources in the Eclipse java build config?
On Aug 24, 4:29 pm, CI-CUBE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fighting for several hours :-( but still get this 'No source code
> is available for type ...' error. From my
> setup on the home office I know it works but until now I did not fi
Perfect. Thanks!
On Jul 30, 8:00 pm, Miguel Méndez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We wanted to let all of you know that the Google Plugin for Eclipse 1.1.0 is
> now available. Some of the notable improvements are:
>
> - Support for Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo)
> - GWT RPC interface validation with qu
Read the manual, read the errors, learn English, get a life.
On Jul 23, 2:46 pm, BMax wrote:
> Hi, I post here my module xml code:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> class="org.xlab.semantic.gwtext.server.SismaServiceImpl"/>
>
in a debugger to
> see if the data gets written out and it if then gets read in? This
> should tell you where the problem lies.
>
> Paul
>
> mirceade wrote:
> > Come on guys, hasn't anybody else used more than plain strings and
> > ints with GWT RPC? Is this re
Ignore my previous comment. It has nothing to do with it.
On May 31, 11:33 am, "igor.khd" wrote:
> Hello guys!
>
> I am using GWT-1.6 + gwt-ext-2.0.5 + gilead (previous name is
> hibernate4gwt).
>
> I encountered next problem:
>
> I am getting next exception when sending to the client an instan
PC code in a debugger to
> see if the data gets written out and it if then gets read in? This
> should tell you where the problem lies.
>
> Paul
>
> mirceade wrote:
> > Come on guys, hasn't anybody else used more than plain strings and
> > ints with GWT RPC? Is this r
Hi Igor. I think your problem is related to mine:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3652
But I can reproduce it in both hosted mode and in the browser. I think
there is a serialization issue with the GWT RPC when sending inherited
(super-class) fields.
On May 31, 11:33
Come on guys, hasn't anybody else used more than plain strings and
ints with GWT RPC? Is this really a bug (not serializing correctly up
on the inheritance chain) or am I doing it all wrong? Help!
On 14 Mai, 18:35, Paul Robinson wrote:
> I don't see anything wrong.
--~--~-~--~~--
I think this is a duplicate of Issue 2557 that was fixed in 1.5 RC 2
but resurfaced in 1.6.4.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web
I don't want to become annoying, but has anyone noticed this while
using
GWT-RPC? Can it be reproduced on another configuration than mine?
On May 14, 9:27 pm, mirceade wrote:
> I don't either, so it must be a serialization issue with gwt RPC. It
> would be very helpful if som
I don't either, so it must be a serialization issue with gwt RPC. It
would be very helpful if somebody else would try to reproduce this bug
too.
On 14 Mai, 18:35, Paul Robinson wrote:
> I don't see anything wrong.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message be
Well,
here it is:
/*
* View.java
*/
package com.client.infrastructure.statemachine;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Panel;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.HashMap;
public abstract class View implements Serializable {
/**
*
*/
private sta
Am I doing something wrong? Is this supposed not to happen by design
and I'm forgetting some configuration?
On May 14, 4:29 pm, mirceade wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> Forgot to add:
>
> All classes are defined in the client package and implement
> Serializable (yes I know that o
you posted is not right because any class doesn't implements
> java.io.Serializable.
>
> You may try to implement java.io.Serializable in any class including
> abstract class.
>
> Jimhttp://www.gwtorm.comhttp://code.google.com/p/dreamsource-orm/
>
> On May 13, 3:
Javascript doesn't usually allow you to maximize the window where your
application is loading, only newly created windows.
On 13 Mai, 21:50, "salvador.ce" wrote:
> try this:
>
> Window window2 = new Window();
> window2.setMaximizable(true);
>
> 2009/5/13 Balasundaram
>
>
>
> > Dear frien
Hi,
I've got a problem for which I've filled a bug but I thought I should
have started with the forum first:
I've got an abstract class with an abstract field. I send an object
whose class is derived from this abstract class with the abstract
property set to another object. When sending the paren
19 matches
Mail list logo
