Hi Djay,
Please take a look here:
http://aarendar.wordpress.com/2010/03/01/learning-gwt-uibinder-part-1/
Sincerely,
Alex
On Jan 26, 8:04 pm, Djay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've started using gwt for a couple of weeks and still face a question
> on which I couldn't find any good answer.
> What is the
a declarative interface does not improve the capability, but when it
is correctly used, and you are not going to rule it in just some
"HelloWorld" example, it boost efficiency and application management.
UiBinder is not an invention of GWT team: declarative interfaces
already exists in many applic
Hi,
I could agree with you, they are likely not to be killer-points for a small
team, but if
you start having a good number of people working on the same projects then
these
may became critical points.
Another aspect that come up in my mind is that you can have different
XXXView.ui.xml
whil
Hi,
After reading some info on that and thanks also to your answer I'm
still not convince.
I've spent some time to study the showcase delivered in the 2.0 SDK
and I don't see any usage of the UIBinder.
I'm really wondering what could be the motivations to use such
architecture (except the 2 reas
Thank you for those points you mentioned.
Actually in my case we are developers and so would have a preferences in
java code rather than in xml instructions.
What I also wonder is if there are some optimisations in using one or the
other method.
Do you have any idea?
Le 26 janv. 2010, 7:57 PM, "M
Hi Gerald,
declarative UI have some good advantages. The ones that first pop up in my mind
are:
- Your Web designers (which are usually not very used to Java fanciness) can be
more confident while
retouching the layout of your application. Which also decrease the chances
that several peopl
Hello,
I've started using gwt for a couple of weeks and still face a question
on which I couldn't find any good answer.
What is the added value of the UIBinder in gwt 2.0?
For example, in my class, I can do:
VerticalPanel vertPanel = new VerticalPanel();
vertPanel.setSize(); and so on
or hav
