I've been thinking about this thread for awhile and have decided to
add my two cents.
First, let me say that I'm huge Google and GWT fan. I've been using
GWT for over two years on multiple projects and I really do think its
great. I just bought myself an Android phone and I'd say its the
+1
On Nov 13, 1:48 am, zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com wrote:
GWT with its powerful set of features, make Large Scale Ajax software
development possible.
from Java to JS compiler, all the optimization, code splitting, MVP,
Guice and Gin, new data binding features,
and one can go on and on ...
+1
completely agree,
Google offered $6 Billion to Groupon,
and are investing in Wind power and space adventures.
as the OP stated, if Google team is too focused on hard problems/
architectural decisions,
why not invest/acquire a company to do this for them and the
community.
Sencha is dedicated
Thanks all for your support of GWT. We're really glad that what you've
seen so far makes you want even more, and let me officially
acknowledge here that the GWT team very much understands that you want
a powerful widget library. That's why we created the powerful new
CellWidgets in 2.1 (in time
+1
On Nov 17, 10:25 am, zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with all the issues that were pointed out about Sencha/Ext.
However, comparing GXT to GWT is comparing apples to oranges.
GXT is only a widget library, you can certainly build applications out
of just putting together some
On 17 nov, 03:25, zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with all the issues that were pointed out about Sencha/Ext.
However, comparing GXT to GWT is comparing apples to oranges.
GXT is only a widget library, you can certainly build applications out
of just putting together some
+1
On Nov 15, 11:05 pm, Jaroslav Záruba jaroslav.zar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 (Isn't there a enhancement request for this?)
Please make it not only richer, but also sleeker looking.
I 3 Google but I think the design/look quite often lacks heavily
behind the service itself, YouTube being one
This should be there in almost all developer's wish list who are using
GWT.
zixzigma,
thanks for bringing up this and i think its better to log a feature
request in Issues list and get more stars (than to get +1 in the post)
in it to draw more attention..
On Nov 16, 3:50 pm, Marcin Misiewicz
On 16 nov, 17:33, har_shan harsha...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be there in almost all developer's wish list who are using
GWT.
Er, absolutely not. I'm more than happy with a widget set that gives
me a total latitude towards how my app will look like. That's one of
the biggest issues of
I completely agree with Thomas on this one. Just look at GXT apps for
another example. By GWT not having slick looking widgets, it forces a
developer to create a look and feel for their own apps. I'd much
prefer the GWT team to keep pumping out more function over form.
Chad Bourque
I completely agree with Thomas on this one.
Me too.
I'd much prefer the GWT team to keep pumping out more function over form.
Agreed!
- Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
On 16 November 2010 10:16, Stephen Haberman stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote:
I completely agree with Thomas on this one.
Me too.
I'd much prefer the GWT team to keep pumping out more function over form.
Agreed!
If the OP and everyone who +1d his request each created a single
widget you'd
I agree with Thomas, but on the other hand it would be nice to have
some more core functionality by default like drag and drop, fx or
something like a light weight (and easy customizable through own
stylesheets) tree widget (without any icons, mouseover styles etc.).
So I also agree with zixzigma.
The new editor framework is easily worth 100 GXT widget libraries.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
I agree with all the issues that were pointed out about Sencha/Ext.
However, comparing GXT to GWT is comparing apples to oranges.
GXT is only a widget library, you can certainly build applications out
of just putting together some widgets.
but to develop scalable apps with great user
+1
:)
2010/11/13 zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com
GWT with its powerful set of features, make Large Scale Ajax software
development possible.
from Java to JS compiler, all the optimization, code splitting, MVP,
Guice and Gin, new data binding features,
and one can go on and on ...
However one
+1
I'm currently learning SmartGWT, LGPL version.
I obviously can't take advantage of everything newly introduced and waited
for a long time, like MPV, I had to wrote my own implementation 3 years ago
to decouple code, and now I have to use their good implementation, but
exiting from GWT
+1
I am currently doing the GWT project honeycrm
http://code.google.com/p/honeycrm/.
A more powerful set of widget is the very last thing that is missing
in the GWT puzzle.
On 15 Nov., 09:39, massimo malvestio massimo.malves...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
I'm currently learning SmartGWT, LGPL version.
+1.
SmartGWT LGPL is the only option for those who don't have lot of time and/or
money to use GWT and still be productive.
If GWT has a decent Table/Grid, Tree, then a lot of users will be content in
just using GWT. Now that Designer is also part of the Google, the next step
would be for Google
On 13 Nov., 07:48, zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com wrote:
But a boy can dream !
All I Want for Christmas is a powerful Widget Library !
a mix between Ext (Application-Oriented) and JQuery plugins (Designer
oriented/eye candy/effects) !
Hi,
I am dreaming from a designed conceptually stable
Hi,
I am dreaming from a designed conceptually stable GWT.
Each year I had to change app due to API-change on concept level!
Even if I understand your needs, I've been in the same situation, I think
it's quite normal that a framework during early years of development could
have an explosive
I agree. We need a robust framework which is pretty to look at too.
I would rather use code coming out of google than anywhere else to be very
honest.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:02 AM, massimo malvestio
massimo.malves...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am dreaming from a designed conceptually
+1
On Nov 15, 3:14 pm, Stefan Bachert stefanbach...@yahoo.de wrote:
On 13 Nov., 07:48, zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com wrote:
But a boy can dream !
All I Want for Christmas is a powerful Widget Library !
a mix between Ext (Application-Oriented) and JQuery plugins (Designer
oriented/eye
FYI...the UiBinder support in GWT Designer is no longer in beta as of
GWT Designer v8.1 and GWT 2.1.
On Nov 13, 1:48 am, zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com wrote:
Google acquired Instantiations(GWT Designer) a while ago, which was
great news,
although many are waiting for them to add UiBinder
That's great news.
Thank You
On Nov 15, 1:43 pm, Eric Clayberg clayb...@google.com wrote:
FYI...the UiBinder support in GWT Designer is no longer in beta as of
GWT Designer v8.1 and GWT 2.1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
+1 (Isn't there a enhancement request for this?)
Please make it not only richer, but also sleeker looking.
I 3 Google but I think the design/look quite often lacks heavily
behind the service itself, YouTube being one blatant example, IMHO. (I
believe Zuckerberg is glad Google does not seem to
+1
HR
2010/11/13 zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com
GWT with its powerful set of features, make Large Scale Ajax software
development possible.
from Java to JS compiler, all the optimization, code splitting, MVP,
Guice and Gin, new data binding features,
and one can go on and on ...
However
I definitely agree! The new CellWidgets are realy nice, but we need
more ;)!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
+1
On 15 November 2010 03:50, Jambi michael.lukaszc...@googlemail.com wrote:
I definitely agree! The new CellWidgets are realy nice, but we need
more ;)!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send
+1
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Prashant nextprash...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 15 November 2010 03:50, Jambi michael.lukaszc...@googlemail.comwrote:
I definitely agree! The new CellWidgets are realy nice, but we need
more ;)!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
GWT with its powerful set of features, make Large Scale Ajax software
development possible.
from Java to JS compiler, all the optimization, code splitting, MVP,
Guice and Gin, new data binding features,
and one can go on and on ...
However one important aspect seem to be neglected for years and
31 matches
Mail list logo