This might not be the best forum for this question, but it
specifically involves GWT code and should be simple, so I'll give it a
shot.

I'm in the process of taking classes from some Google-written GWT
modules (both java and jsni code), mangling them, and writing code on
top of the result. Obviously this is fine because of the original
license, but as I post my code online (still under the Apache 2.0
License), I'm wondering what other people in a similar situation have
done with the notice on the top of source files.

Specifically, for those files that qualify as "Derivative works" but
contain significant code copyrighted by Google, how have people best
fulfilled their obligations to

"2. You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that You changed the files; and

3. You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that
You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution
notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that
do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and

4. ...You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications
and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for
any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction,
and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions
stated in this License."
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html

Thanks!

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


Reply via email to