Hi guys,
In order to track exceptions in our GWT application (client-side), we
hook a global exception handler in our EntryPoint. Our exception
handler builds the stack trace from the exception and sends it to our
server (we have a GWT servlet to receive error messages).
Now, our problem is that
Any ideas, everyone? I'm currently stuck on this. :(
On Feb 22, 8:06 pm, Mark wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> In order to track exceptions in our GWT application (client-side), we
> hook a global exception handler in our EntryPoint. Our exception
> handler builds the stack trace from the exception and sen
Hi,
so what you basically want to have is that gwtc saves a dictionary
file during compilation that can later be used to undo the name
substitution. And possibly also recreate the line numbers etc.
(something that some Java obfuscators can do, e.g. I've used this
functionality with Zelix Klassmast
Hi Chris,
> so what you basically want to have is that gwtc saves a dictionary
> file during compilation that can later be used to undo the name
> substitution. And possibly also recreate the line numbers etc.
> (something that some Java obfuscators can do, e.g. I've used this
> functionality wit
While I have no idea about the Gwtc source code, I just browsed a
little bit around in the gwt source, and I think a first attempt could
be to create a dictionary by hooking into
com.google.gwt.dev.js.ast.JsName.setShortIdent()
This is just a wild guess, and it probably won't work very well,
becau
It's quite complicated, and very very rough,
you can add a local final string, or a local unique final numerical
identifier to the critical methods (or all methods) and adding this
information to the stacktarce string.
something similar to:
public int mymethod( long thing){
static final int l
I think I have posted twice but I try again to be safe:
This solution sucks but you can try adding an unique identifier to
your methods example:
public int myMethod(long thing){
static final int localID = 33;//33 is unique identifier for
Mymethod This could be a String as well, but you lost ob
ERROR, I cannot declare static variables into the method, please
forgot about the errors above, I find very difficult to write valid
code without an IDE
Regards
public int myMethod(long thing){
final int localID = 33;//33 is unique identifier for Mymethod This
could be a String as well, but yo
@Chris
to make things clear, my : "It's quite complicated, and very very
rough," is a comment about my own proposal.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
Another idea..
you have simply yo implement a printStackTrace method with 2 arguments
in a utility class:
public void printStackTrace(Exception e, int localID){
String stackTraceNew = e.getStackTrace+" ID "+localID;
e.setStackTrace(stackNewTrace);
e.printStackTrace();
};
you
On 25 fév, 13:38, Chris Lercher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so what you basically want to have is that gwtc saves a dictionary
> file during compilation that can later be used to undo the name
> substitution. And possibly also recreate the line numbers etc.
> (something that some Java obfuscators can do, e
On Feb 26, 5:30 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Something like the -compileReport
> -XsoycDetailed?http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCompileReport.html
> (the page is about the -compileReport, what you're looking for is the -
> XsoycDetailed which is only briefly described)
Hey, I
> PS It's great, that the files are using the hash names of the
> *.cash.html files, so they can be archived very easily.
Did I really write "cash.html"? I need more coffee ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to thi
On Feb 26, 5:30 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> On 25 fév, 13:38, Chris Lercher wrote:
> Something like the -compileReport
> -XsoycDetailed?http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCompileReport.html
> (the page is about the -compileReport, what you're looking for is the -
> XsoycDetaile
do you know if there is a tool that will "translate" the stack into
readable form? Or is somebody going to implement it?
On 26. Feb, 17:43 h., Chris Lercher wrote:
> On Feb 26, 5:30 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> > Something like the -compileReport
> > -XsoycDetailed?http://code.google.com/webtoo
I don't know of such a tool. But if a simple search and replace on the
StackTrace isn't good enough (it might not be, because the obfuscated
names are very short), then there's an ANTLR grammar for parsing stack
traces here: http://www.antlr.org/grammar/1205078833386/StackTraceText.g
Otherwise, it
Thanks for the replies, guys. Very much helpful. :)
I've started going around -compileReport and the soyc and it looks
like these are what I need! I'm now implementing a crude version of
our stack trace converter. :)
Just one hurdle encountered so far: Stack traces from Chrome and
Firefox have d
On Mar 1, 12:35 pm, Mark wrote:
> Thanks for the replies, guys. Very much helpful. :)
>
> I've started going around -compileReport and the soyc and it looks
> like these are what I need! I'm now implementing a crude version of
> our stack trace converter. :)
>
> Just one hurdle encountered so fa
Hi Thomas,
Sorry for the late reply; other work caught up.
The link you provided looks very interesting. This is probably what we
need. Will take a detailed look on this.
On Mar 2, 9:38 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> On Mar 1, 12:35 pm, Mark wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the replies, guys. Very much he
19 matches
Mail list logo
