am, Ponthiaux Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > If you have the time to "mock" your project you're lucky : ).
>>> >
>>> > > Anyway JMock looks better .
>>> >
>>> > > regards .
>>&
> >
>> > > Arthur Kalmenson a écrit :
>> >
>> > > > This question was already asked a number of times.
>> >
>> > > > For server side testing, you can use any mocking framework
ked a number of times.
> >
> > > > For server side testing, you can use any mocking framework you want.
> > > > However, for client side testing of GWT specific code, you cannot use
> > > > either mocking frameworks since they utilize reflection. Reflection
&
rks since they utilize reflection. Reflection is
> > > not supported on the client side for performance reasons.
>
> > > Regards,
> > > Arthur Kalmenson
>
> > > On Oct 8, 10:02 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> &g
> > However, for client side testing of GWT specific code, you cannot use
> > either mocking frameworks since they utilize reflection. Reflection is
> > not supported on the client side for performance reasons.
>
> > Regards,
> > Arthur Kalmenson
>
> > On
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Can you use either EASYMOCK or JMOCK for unit testing purposes? Are
>> there any restrictions or problems?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this messag
for performance reasons.
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 8, 10:02 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you use either EASYMOCK or JMOCK for unit testing purposes? Are
> there any restrictions or problems?
>
> Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~-
Can you use either EASYMOCK or JMOCK for unit testing purposes? Are
there any restrictions or problems?
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to
