I've actually written some wrappers around the app-engine specific
data containers. I wrote it a while ago, so some things that are new
are missing (like Address, Phone etc.) But Text and User are in there
(along with some others).
here is the library:
http://www.resmarksystems.com/code/
it's im
Is useless to double code with DTO then they just have to use the
clone () from Gilead to use its pojo with GWT client code.
On 7 déc, 08:13, Dalla wrote:
> Think I´ll probably just go with DTOs then, using a third party lib
> for this seems a bit overkill if you ask me :-)
>
> On 6 Dec, 13:51, J
Think I´ll probably just go with DTOs then, using a third party lib
for this seems a bit overkill if you ask me :-)
On 6 Dec, 13:51, Jonas Huckestein wrote:
> Hi Dalla,
>
> in our team we create an interface for each model object which the JDO
> objects and client objects implement.
>
> Unfortun
Hi Dalla,
in our team we create an interface for each model object which the JDO
objects and client objects implement.
Unfortunately we were unable to find a solution which requires only
one implementation of each class, since we use JSON for data transer
and the client-side implementations are J
That or you could look at gilead for appengine. It will allow you to
serialize the user object.
http://noon.gilead.free.fr/gilead/index.php?page=gwt
On Dec 6, 4:34 am, Dalla wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I´m just now getting started with using GWT and GAE.
> Curious about best practices when it comes to J
On Dec 6, 4:34 am, Dalla wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I´m just now getting started with using GWT and GAE.
> Curious about best practices when it comes to JDOs, and how to handle
> them client side.
>
> Let´s say I want to store a String and a User object that would be
> picked up from the UserService.
>
Hi all
I´m just now getting started with using GWT and GAE.
Curious about best practices when it comes to JDOs, and how to handle
them client side.
Let´s say I want to store a String and a User object that would be
picked up from the UserService.
Since the GWT compiler doesn´t emulate com.google.
