This works absolutly fine for single display view.
How can I use this for a multi displau view?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To
Hi,
Have you written any tests for this? Im curious about the testing
abilities of a GWT app which uses GIN etc using EasyMock or Mockito or
something.
I've been told that it's very easy to test with Junit tests.. is this
the case? Do you have any examples?
Thanks in advance,
Frank B
On Oct 24,
in the following code fragment posted:
@Override
public Activity getActivity(Place place) {
if (place instanceof HelloPlace) {
return injector.getHelloActivity().withPlace((HelloPlace)
injector.getHelloActivity().withPlace((HelloPlace)
could you please explain
gives you the Activity*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Moe,
Are you using PlaceHistoryMapperWithFactory? If so, my best guess is
that you're forgetting to call setFactory in your onModuleLoad():
AppPlaceHistoryMapper historyMapper =
GWT.create(AppPlaceHistoryMapper.class);
historyMapper.setFactory(ginjector.getAppPlaceFactory());
If that's not
Hi Amir,
Yes, your absolutely right - forgot to call setFactory! Now
everything is working stunningly. I've put together a sample bit of
code using the Contact Details code I mentioned previously and it can
be downloaded at:
By the way, something I realised that although we can't map a 1-Many
relationship between a Place and an Activity, you can in fact map
multiple places to the same activity and differentiate between the
place with multiple init() methods in the activity.
On Oct 24, 1:56 pm, moejo
Hi All,
I'm working on getting an example together and I am having issues
setting up the injectors for the code you've suggested above (Amir,
david, Aodhagán). So far, I've setup everything as you've suggested
for the AppActivityMapper, AppPlaceFactory, AppPlaceHistoryMapper,
Places and
Sorry, feel like I might be missing some info to you. I've basically
got two items:
3 Places
- ContactPlace
- EditContactPlace
- NewContactPlace
which map to 2 activities:
- ContactActivity
- EditContactActivity
the contact activity is initally loading fine, but there is a click to
add a new
I've been playing around with this for som time. I can't see a more
reasonable solution than the one Amir and Aigeec proposed.
Sure, the getActivity method with a long list of if-the-else's doesn't
seem nice, but this alternative is just too much boilerplate for my
liking. Lots of Provider
Oops. Substitute MailGinjector with AppGinjector. I'm playing around
with the Mail sample code.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
On 21 oct, 21:15, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hi Yuan,
Unfortunately, the mere mention of a need for something does not imply
its current availability :-) I wrote the Activities and Places doc and
really should have left GIN out of it for the time being. The root
issue is
Hey Amir,
That is pretty much where I got to. I don't use a clientfactory and
have replaced it with GIN injection. I don't use a Factory to create
the Activity as I have implemented my ActivityPlace slightly
differently.
Let me know if I have gone completely crazy or have missed some
fundamental
Thanks for sharing your code, Amir. It's great to see this fleshed
out. One possible simplification is to eliminate PlaceTokenizers
entirely. These are required by the generated PlaceHistoryMapper, but
you are free to create your own implementation of PlaceHistoryMapper
which does not use
Thanks for sharing your code also, Aodhagán. As both you and Amir have
pointed out, there is not necessarily a 1:1 correspondence between
Activity and Place, so the notion of an ActivityPlace may not fit
every situation.
Where I do have an issue now though is actually going to a new Place?
How would you all envision code splitting working with these examples?
For example, if you want to code split an activity and view, and then
restrict access to that code with a permission check.
I would like to be able to split out code that the user does not have
permission to use so they don't
Injecting a ProviderGoodbyePlace into your certainly works. We opted
to repurpose the AppPlaceFactory for this, however. In addition to the
required methods returning the tokenizer, we have convenience methods
to get a new place:
GoodbyePlace.Tokenizer getGoodbyeTokenzer() { ... }
Thanks, I hadn't thought of that.
The way we're minimizing code right now, is by creating some useful
abstract tokenizers that handle the common use cases (no parameter
tokenizer, key-value pair tokenizer). With those there are
corresponding abstract tokenizers that handle creating the hashCode
Hi Richard,
We're still working on an official story for how best to use runAsync
with Activities and Places. In the mean time, feedback on your
experiences is welcome. GWT's AsyncProxy class or the AsyncProvider in
GIN trunk look promising as ways to wrap Activity creation with a
runAsync()
On 22 oct, 19:50, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
We're still working on an official story for how best to use runAsync
with Activities and Places. In the mean time, feedback on your
experiences is welcome. GWT's AsyncProxy class or the AsyncProvider in
GIN trunk
Thank you Thomas,
that's what I was thinking -- and I'm playing with a custom code
generator already :)
Just wondering what they mean with the GIN comments in the doc/code...
In my pre-2.1 homegrown framework I use a code-generated presenter
config based on a Ginjector (declaring all the
There is another thread on the GWT contributors group about this
topic.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/732e66a858a8ef0b/38a3f36ffc1767a0
-Richard
On Oct 21, 5:59 am, Sebastian Beigel sebast...@beigel.de wrote:
Thank you Thomas,
that's what
can't use gin at ActivityMapper? somehower, on the HelloMVP
AppActivityMapper,
it says
public Activity getActivity(Place place) {
// This is begging for GIN
if (place instanceof HelloPlace)
return new HelloActivity((HelloPlace)
Hi Yuan,
Unfortunately, the mere mention of a need for something does not imply
its current availability :-) I wrote the Activities and Places doc and
really should have left GIN out of it for the time being. The root
issue is that GIN does not have a way to createMeA(Foo.class), as such
a method
I work with Tolga, who started the thread on GWTC. Here's the solution
we came up with based on David's initial suggestion there.
1) We created a base class called ActivityPlace, that has an abstract
getActivty() method:
public Activity getActivity();
2) Thus, the the getActivity method in
Hi,
I'm looking at 2.1 (RC1) for the first time right now and I try to
refactor the hellomvp sample to use GIN.
Unfortunately, I have some problems with the places - activities
mapping. The doc says A better way to implement the chain of nested
ifs would be with a GIN module. and the code is
Well I'm also very interested in some guidelines of how to use gin
with activities and places.
On Oct 20, 11:42 am, Sebastian Beigel sebast...@beigel.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at 2.1 (RC1) for the first time right now and I try to
refactor the hellomvp sample to use GIN.
Unfortunately, I
I had the exactly same doubt. And I thought about it, but couldn't
find out how you can do that mapping with GIN.
In fact, Roo's generated projects don't use a GIN-based mapping
although they use GIN in other parts.
So I'm interested to know the answer to this question too. :P
On 20 oct, 07:42,
I don't know if this will help, but i recreated the Contact Details
app which is under the Large scale application development article
at http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/articles/mvp-architecture.html
using just a clientFactory to allow a more thorough working example
using GWT 2.1 Activities
On 20 oct, 11:42, Sebastian Beigel sebast...@beigel.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at 2.1 (RC1) for the first time right now and I try to
refactor the hellomvp sample to use GIN.
Unfortunately, I have some problems with the places - activities
mapping. The doc says A better way to implement the
30 matches
Mail list logo
