;)
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 10:31:24 PM UTC+8, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 1:56:28 PM UTC+2, Thomas wrote:
>>
>> @tbroyer, sorry, yes, they are strings. Will check out the archetype(s)
>> and see how we can handle shared enums easiest. Splitting it up might give
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 1:56:28 PM UTC+2, Thomas wrote:
>
> @tbroyer, sorry, yes, they are strings. Will check out the archetype(s)
> and see how we can handle shared enums easiest. Splitting it up might give
> me some other advantages as well.
> How certain are you about compile times?
>
@DavidN - Wow, how can anyone work productively with 30+ mins ???
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 7:48:15 PM UTC+8, DavidN wrote:
>
> You are complaining of a startup of 1 minute ? I know some projects that
> have 30+ minutes with GWT 2.7! In those cases there are a lot of reasons
> why their
@tbroyer, sorry, yes, they are strings. Will check out the archetype(s) and
see how we can handle shared enums easiest. Splitting it up might give me
some other advantages as well.
How certain are you about compile times?
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 7:01:57 PM UTC+8, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
Thanks Jens, will have a look. Pity that performance is becoming such a
breaking point as any dev is loosing productivity with the long compiles
times (not talking about some frustration onboarding developers who have no
GWT experience and are used to quicker turn around times).
On Monday,
You are complaining of a startup of 1 minute ? I know some projects that
have 30+ minutes with GWT 2.7! In those cases there are a lot of reasons
why their compile time is so long.
In my current app I also have about 2 minutes startup time and an
incremental reload of about 5 seconds. We are also
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 10:49:00 AM UTC+2, Thomas Buckel wrote:
>
> Also wondering how to split client and server into different mvn modules
> when using ReqFactory - @ProxyForName and @ServiceName should work for
> class names, however they still require a class reference to the
>
> Interesting. We're also using GIN and UiBinder, but also
> GWT-RequestFactory with editors/drivers. So lots to things to be generated.
>
If you are curious you can generate some profiling data using
-Dgwt.speedtracerlog=/tmp/speedtracer.gwt.json
-Dgwt.speedtracerformat=RAW
as JVM
Interesting. We're also using GIN and UiBinder, but also GWT-RequestFactory
with editors/drivers. So lots to things to be generated.
Also wondering how to split client and server into different mvn modules
when using ReqFactory - @ProxyForName and @ServiceName should work for
class names,
> Things I would try:
>
>- GWT 2.8; SDM will likely be faster
>- removing server-side dependencies from GWT classpath; which means
>with Maven splitting client and server code into separate modules.
>
>
I guess it won't really help. We are in the same situation using some
custom
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 10:09:06 AM UTC+2, Thomas Buckel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on an enterprise GWT app for the last few years. It has
> grown and will grow quite a bit and compile times (DevMode, SuperDevMode)
> are becoming a real pain point for the developers.
>
> A
Hi all,
I've been working on an enterprise GWT app for the last few years. It has
grown and will grow quite a bit and compile times (DevMode, SuperDevMode)
are becoming a real pain point for the developers.
A SuperDevMode initial compile takes about 50sec with GWT2.7/Java7 on a
2.6GHz i7
12 matches
Mail list logo
