> Please start this issue:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3769&q=S...
"start" = "star", right? I just did so. Hopefully, if there are enough
stars, this will make it into a future GWT version.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Please start this issue:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3769&q=ServerOnly
On Feb 5, 5:00 pm, Gal Dolber wrote:
> Yes... I just had a case of that... now I understand your problem
>
> 2010/2/5 Axel Rauschmayer
>
>
>
> > The problem is that the GWT compiler will comp
Yes... I just had a case of that... now I understand your problem
2010/2/5 Axel Rauschmayer
> The problem is that the GWT compiler will complain about server-only
> classes that the "dual" code uses.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web
The problem is that the GWT compiler will complain about server-only
classes that the "dual" code uses.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscrib
I am 99% sure that if you don't use the method on the client the GWT
compiler will erase it. Regards
2010/2/4 Axel Rauschmayer
> Use case: a data object has some methods that only the server needs.
>
> I'm currently using my own tool to create patched versions of a class
> with server-only code.
Use case: a data object has some methods that only the server needs.
I'm currently using my own tool to create patched versions of a class
with server-only code. It removes methods annotated with @GwtIgnore
and places the result so that it overrides the server version whenever
GWT is involved.
Is
