Re: Is for each loop faster than for loop?

2009-12-16 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, "flyingb...@gmail.com" wrote: > Just wondering what is a better way to code. Using for each loops or > for loops? > > I am wondering will the resulting javascript be different. It first depends whether you're looping on an array or an Iterable. With an array, GWT compiles t

Re: Is for each loop faster than for loop?

2009-12-15 Thread Chris Lowe
If you're using the Eclipse plugin, then select compile button from the toolbar and you'll find the output option on the compile options dialog. The resulting output files will show more readable javascript. On Dec 15, 6:58 pm, "flyingb...@gmail.com" wrote: > Well i just ran test i not sure ho

Re: Is for each loop faster than for loop?

2009-12-15 Thread flyingb...@gmail.com
Well i just ran test i not sure how to compile out differently but it seems like for each loop is slow. - For Each Loop --- Start: 1260903435636 End: 1260903435648 ForEach - Elapsed time in milliseconds: 12 ---END--- - Iterator Loop --- Start: 1260903435648 End:

Re: Is for each loop faster than for loop?

2009-12-15 Thread Chris Lowe
You could try compiling with the Pretty or Detailed options and examine the javascript? On Dec 15, 6:29 pm, "flyingb...@gmail.com" wrote: > Just wondering what is a better way to code. Using for each loops or > for loops? > > I am wondering will the resulting javascript be different. -- You rec

Is for each loop faster than for loop?

2009-12-15 Thread flyingb...@gmail.com
Just wondering what is a better way to code. Using for each loops or for loops? I am wondering will the resulting javascript be different. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-too