I discovered part of the the answer to this. I didn't realize that I
had an additional attribute in the "module" element of the xml file
called "rename-to". So In the xml file of the module directory named
"bar", the module element looks like
Wheres for the other it is simply
--
You receiv
tice that some of
the names are the fully qualified name and others are just the name.
Like one directory is named "com.mycompany.foo" and the other is just
named "bar". Is there any reason for this difference in naming
convention of modules as directories?
I also notic
