Re: Need fix for GWT 1.6 Jars in Maven Repo

2009-06-03 Thread eneveu
Hi Salvador, Sorry for answering so late, I didn't check this thread in a while. The code you posted in the pastebin is expired, but here is how we declared our GWT dependencies: com.google.gwt gwt-servlet ${gwtVersion} com

Re: Need fix for GWT 1.6 Jars in Maven Repo

2009-04-24 Thread Salvador Diaz
I don't really think this is a bug, as you shouldn't have to include gwt-user in your war anyway. That's what the gwt-servlet is for. Does including the gwt dependencies in your pom in the following way solves the problem ? See here for the snippet: http://pastebin.com/m5960979b I'm curious abou

Re: Need fix for GWT 1.6 Jars in Maven Repo

2009-04-23 Thread cyril.lakech
still the same bug in the 1.6.4 release ! On 4 mar, 14:47, eneveu wrote: > I had the same problem yesterday, and I stumbled on this post. Thanks > a lot for the explanation. > > I opened an issue > here:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3439 > > (Will, since your post

Re: Need fix for GWT 1.6 Jars in Maven Repo

2009-03-04 Thread eneveu
I had the same problem yesterday, and I stumbled on this post. Thanks a lot for the explanation. I opened an issue here: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3439 (Will, since your post explained the problem clearly, I took it as a basis in the issue's description (changi

Re: Need fix for GWT 1.6 Jars in Maven Repo

2009-03-03 Thread Garey
I am also having this issue. The workaround isn't hard, but it's annoying and I would rather not do it for every release. Thanks, g On Feb 26, 10:49 am, Will wrote: > Not sure who is reposponsible for the jars deployed to maven, but I am > having issues with the versions deployed there. > > T

Need fix for GWT 1.6 Jars in Maven Repo

2009-02-26 Thread Will
Not sure who is reposponsible for the jars deployed to maven, but I am having issues with the versions deployed there. The 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 versions of gwt-dev and gwt-user jars contain the source code for the javax.servlet package. The problem is the source code has a newer timestamp than the cl