We've been using PureMVC at organization for many years, and when I
created our first GWT project, I decided to keep things consistent. So
far, it's been smooth sailing, however I haven't done any memory
profiling.
Overall though if you've used PureMVC before, then you'll
I use MVP as described here
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideMvpActivitiesAndPlaces.html
together with RF
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideRequestFactory.html and
editors http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiEditors.html
So far there are
.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM>Hope those url's work, if you
> > haven't seen them already.
>
> > I'm leery of what you might mean by "pureMVC" as like more IT concepts, it
> > can get muddled: MVP being no exception. I've implemented or worked wi
develop (not a complete library or framework).
I thin mediator in PureMVC are like the EventBus...
On 8 avr, 04:27, Brian Lough wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa...
> <http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thre
27;s work, if you
haven't seen them already.
I'm leery of what you might mean by "pureMVC" as like more IT concepts, it
can get muddled: MVP being no exception. I've implemented or worked with a
bunch of MVC implementations, J2EE and otherwise. MVP is worth the effort
requi
, Rodolphe Gomes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am still having doubts between integrating MVP or PureMVC.
> Does anyone has any production experience - drawbacks ?
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Goog
Hello,
I am still having doubts between integrating MVP or PureMVC.
Does anyone has any production experience - drawbacks ?
Thanks a lot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Alexander and Balachandra, you are welcome anytime, i'm glad things
are clearer now.
And like you said, Bala, it depends on the context, sure if you
already have your application,
designed in MVC and it's working for you, sure no need to build the
whole application again in MVP.
However, if you'r
Hi Joe,
Thx for the details. actually, i did looked at ryan talk before. during
the session there were questions like if there is a working model which
working then why would shifting to this pattern be significant. well, i have
my ans for those then and now. and yes, MVP is a better pattern her
Guys, thanks for the link to this video. It really opened my eyes! I am so
thankful!
2009/12/17 Joe
> If you follow the second link, watch the video and you should
> understand, as Maryan said.
>
> The following paragraph is almost the same words Ray Ryan spoke at the
> Google IO concerning MVC
If you follow the second link, watch the video and you should
understand, as Maryan said.
The following paragraph is almost the same words Ray Ryan spoke at the
Google IO concerning MVC and MVP:
"I keep saying "MVP, MVP, MVP." And I did not say MVC. Now the odds
are that when you got out of the f
Watch best practices from ray ryan to understand.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+u
dpress.com/2009/06/03/forget-mvc-use-mvp/
>
> and
>
>
> http://code.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/GoogleWebToolkitBestPractices.html
>
> Good luck!
>
> On Dec 15, 3:58 pm, Fabien wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know if someone try to merge PureM
Check out the project GWT-Presenter.
It's really worth it !
Christian Goudreau
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Joe wrote:
> Welcome,
> anytime mate :)
>
> On Dec 16, 4:30 pm, Fabien wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > Thanks, I think it was I'm looking for :)
> >
> > On Dec 16, 1:34 pm, Joe wrote:
Here you can read and see one example for use pureMVC and GWT
http://trac.puremvc.org/Demo_Java_MultiCore_GWT_EmployeeAdmin
We use this example as guide in our application.
2009/12/16 Joe
> Welcome,
> anytime mate :)
>
> On Dec 16, 4:30 pm, Fabien wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
Welcome,
anytime mate :)
On Dec 16, 4:30 pm, Fabien wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks, I think it was I'm looking for :)
>
> On Dec 16, 1:34 pm, Joe wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Fabien,
>
> > I'm afraid you should build your GWT applications in MVP (Model - View
> > - Presenter) design pattern and not MVC (Mod
Hi Joe,
Thanks, I think it was I'm looking for :)
On Dec 16, 1:34 pm, Joe wrote:
> Hi Fabien,
>
> I'm afraid you should build your GWT applications in MVP (Model - View
> - Presenter) design pattern and not MVC (Model - View - Controller),
> as stated by ray Ryan at Google IO 2009.
>
> Check o
and
http://code.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/GoogleWebToolkitBestPractices.html
Good luck!
On Dec 15, 3:58 pm, Fabien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if someone try to merge PureMVC and GWT ?
>
> And if true, if someone can help me with just an example or a
&g
Hi,
I would like to know if someone try to merge PureMVC and GWT ?
And if true, if someone can help me with just an example or a
tutorial.
Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, sen
Hi,
The official release of PureMVC GWT compliant is:
http://trac.puremvc.org/PureMVC_Java_MultiCore
I've released the port of the employee admin which is visible on:
http://employeeadm.appspot.com/
The source code will be released soon in the official PureMVC
repository.
On 26 mai,
Anyone using PureMVC with GWT 1.6 and/or GXT? Do I need puremvc4gwt
or just PureMVC? I would love to see a sample demo and source.
Anyone have a link or code they can share?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi Thomas,
I've seen some widgets be injected other widgets but not a single
event listener (or I missed something).
It's true that for my project I only injected some widgets on a main
panel. That's the project specific choice. Because it's more easy to
do that.
I'am not very clear your u
Hi Thomas,
> I've seen some widgets be injected other widgets but not a single
>
event listener (or I missed something).
It's true that for my project I only injected some widgets on a main panel.
That's the project specific choice. Because it's more easy to do that.
I'am not very clear yo
-- Forwarded message --
From: yunhui song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: PureMVC
To: Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
Hi Thomas,
> I've seen some widgets be injected other widgets but not a single
>
event list
Hi Thomas,
> I've seen some widgets be injected other widgets but not a single
>
event listener (or I missed something).
It's true that for my project I only injected some widgets on a main panel.
That's the project specific choice. Because it's more easy to do that.
I'am not very clear yo
On 27 oct, 00:09, "yunhui song" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Actually, Gin is used to implements Ioc Container. It can bind everything
> not only event Listener.
>
> Guice or Spring can do that naturally, but because GWT can not support
> Java reflection, such as forClass("className")
Hi,
Actually, Gin is used to implements Ioc Container. It can bind everything
not only event Listener.
Guice or Spring can do that naturally, but because GWT can not support
Java reflection, such as forClass("className").getInstance. So Gin use
generic and annotation to do that.
I have a o
i"
> without using the GETTestCasewhich is a "no-go" Testcase :-)
>
>
> Please let me hear how you progress and the experiences you have with
> puremvc
>
> /FLeming
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM, marcelo melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
On 23 oct, 19:09, "yunhui song" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have used Guice and Gin to implements MVC framework(like backend spring
> framework). By this way view(ui), event Listener and data
> access(xmlHttpReqeust wrapped by REST-GWT) can be seperated by three layers.
>
> Gin mo
Hi,
>>>Flemming Boller
We used Gwt only component too.
Our mediator give this components a 'Gwt ClickListener' wich send
Pure Notification.
Matthieu.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web To
hard reference" the mediator.
>
> > We want the mediator to be "unaware" of GWT because that means we are able
> > to perform many junit tests of the "gui"
> > without using the GETTestCasewhich is a "no-go" Testcase :-)
>
> > Pl
-)
>
>
> Please let me hear how you progress and the experiences you have with
> puremvc
>
> /FLeming
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM, marcelo melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Totally agree with you... Simplicity is key most of the times
ot;gui"
without using the GETTestCasewhich is a "no-go" Testcase :-)
Please let me hear how you progress and the experiences you have with
puremvc
/FLeming
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM, marcelo melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Totally agree with you... Simpl
>
> But common sense and "keep it simple" should be used here :-)
>
>
> /Flemming
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:48 PM, marcelo melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, is anyone using PureMVC for Java / GWT?
>>
>> Thanks
&
ep it simple" should be used here :-)
/Flemming
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:48 PM, marcelo melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Hi, is anyone using PureMVC for Java / GWT?
>
> Thanks
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received th
Hi, is anyone using PureMVC for Java / GWT?
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To u
36 matches
Mail list logo
