Hi,
this is a mean exception - as it seems to happen irregularly. In case
you have the same problems I also had already: take the outermost
object (the one you directly pass into the service or return from the
service) and create private local variables for ALL types that have
ever caused problems.
No constructor is the same as a default constructor, so you should be fine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send ema
Some of them have no constructor. The rest is ok
On Feb 14, 2011 8:40 PM, "Jeff Larsen" wrote:
> Does every entity follow the required serialization policy for gwt? i.e.
> have a default constructor and all nested objects are serializable. Note
> Class is not serializable.
>
> --
> You received th
Does every entity follow the required serialization policy for gwt? i.e.
have a default constructor and all nested objects are serializable. Note
Class is not serializable.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this
So basicaly there is no pb if every entity implements IsSerializable and the
top class, that is extended by those entities, implements
java.io.Serializable?
On Feb 14, 2011 5:13 PM, "joe kolba" wrote:
> I have ran into this problem also. First thing make sure everything is
> implementing IsSeriali
I have ran into this problem also. First thing make sure everything is
implementing IsSerializable, second make sure that you refresh your webapp
folder in the web-inf so your .rpc files get refreshed. Most of the time I
have to encounter a RPC exception in order to force the rpc file to be
creat
I use GWT to develop my app, deploying it to GAE. Sometimes, (more
often when switching between different versions) i get this exception:
javax.servlet.ServletContext log: Exception while dispatching incoming
RPC call
com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException: Type
'ro.expert.evt.shared
