David,
I understand your point, it's shame. As soon as enough people start
adopting smartGWT, critical mass will be built.
I know, for example, the Instantiations group is finishing integrating
GWT-Ext into their VisualGWT product (which is a great $60 spend
IMO). But Ext-JS will never get bet
i think gwt-ext is enough for my application now, although the ext
engine will not be update again.
if just making CRUD app gwt-ext is enough.
Best Regards
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web
Ah.. it's not that easy to cast aside GWT-EXT, unfortunately. While
SmartGWT is coming along.. it still does not have quite the same
polish of EXT. Ext-GWT may be equivalent to GWT-EXT, but the dual-
license is restrictive for some environments.
Although it's original creator, Sanjiv, may have
Well we use regular GWT here and it works very well. I've heard good
things about gwt-mosaic: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-mosaic/ but I
haven't used it myself.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:20 PM, tv wrote:
>
> FWIW:
>
> I'm looking at starting a GWT project using a widget li
FWIW:
I'm looking at starting a GWT project using a widget library add-in.
Only after reading for some time did I realize there was some tension
between the team that created the Ext JS library and the team that
created the GWT-Ext library (that relies on Ext-JS). So now there are
two alternativ
