David-
I see that gwt-user and gwt-dev are up on central, but are you posting
gwt-servlet as well?
Thanks,
Justin
On Jul 14, 10:18 pm, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hangtight,folks,we'reon it. Ashasbeennotedin thisthread,GWT
itself is not built with maven, so it's not a 100%
Done.
Announcement here:
http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/07/gwt-204-now-available-in-maven-central.html
/dmc
On Jul 16, 1:04 pm, jus...@justinedelson.com
justinedel...@gmail.com wrote:
David-
I see that gwt-user and gwt-dev are up on central, but are you posting
gwt-servlet as
Thanks. But... unfortunately, it looks like the exclusion of gwt-soyc-
vis means that 2.0.4 can't work with version 1.2 of the gwt-maven-
plugin. I understand gwt-soyc-vis is deprecated, but could you post it
anyway?
I can't post it to another repository because the artifact I'm working
on is
I went ahead and uploaded gwt-soyc-vis-2.0.4.jar because it is still
distributed in the GWT SDK download. Kindly log the plugin issue at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT.
Thank you,
/dmc
On Jul 16, 5:11 pm, jus...@justinedelson.com
justinedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. But...
It looks like this is already fixed for 2.1. Do you plan on releasing
a 2.0.5 version? If not, it probably doesn't make sense to fix it.
Justin
On Jul 16, 10:18 pm, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
I went ahead and uploaded gwt-soyc-vis-2.0.4.jar because it is still
distributed in
Thats great news !!
Thanks David/GWT Team
:-) Kasper
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:18 AM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hang tight, folks, we're on it. As has been noted in this thread, GWT
itself is not built with maven, so it's not a 100% automated process
to push to maven
Thanks for your efforts David.
On Jul 15, 4:18 am, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hang tight, folks, we're on it. As has been noted in this thread, GWT
itself is not built with maven, so it's not a 100% automated process
to push to maven central. But we're working hard to get
Thanks GWT team.
On Jul 15, 4:18 am, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hang tight, folks, we're on it. As has been noted in this thread, GWT
itself is not built with maven, so it's not a 100% automated process
to push to maven central. But we're working hard to get gwt-user-2.0.4
Thanks David!
I'll spread the news in our team...
Andreas
On 15 Jul., 04:18, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hang tight, folks, we're on it. As has been noted in this thread, GWT
itself is not built with maven, so it's not a 100% automated process
to push to maven central. But
Now that I think about it this development was expected since Google
and WMWare decided to integrate GWT with Spring Roo which uses Maven
under the hood. The integration would not make sense if they did not
put the GWT libs in the repo. Will Google be developing a Maven plugin
(or contribute to
On 15 juil, 14:52, monkeyboy dilbert.elbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that I think about it this development was expected since Google
and WMWare decided to integrate GWT with Spring Roo which uses Maven
under the hood. The integration would not make sense if they did not
put the GWT libs in the
I build gwt with maven. I haven't checked if you do, but you don't/
shouldn't bundle the gwt-user dependencies with the artefact. Gwt-dev
needs all its dependencies bundled though; gwt-maven-plugin won't work
otherwise.
On Jul 15, 10:18 am, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hang
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Kasper Hansen kbhdk1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would also wish that Google would take Maven more seriously. I can
only recommend all that agree to star the issues regarding Maven in
the bug tracker.
Here it is (the issue regarding Maven):
: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:10:37
To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: This is getting beyond a joke
Or, maybe you're over-estimating importance of Maven for average
GWT-developer...?
On Wed, Jul
:10:37
To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: This is getting beyond a joke
Or, maybe you're over-estimating importance of Maven for average
GWT-developer...?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Richard Vowles
richard.vow
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: This is getting beyond a joke
Or, maybe you're over-estimating importance of Maven for average
GWT-developer...?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Richard Vowles
richard.vow...@gmail.comwrote:
We do host our own repository - thats not the point. The point
Have you read the same conversation I did?
Look what subject has the original poster chosen:
*This is getting beyond a joke*
In my book this has way closer to being aggresssive than anything anyone
has replied so far.
*I understand that the Google guys don't use maven or ivy, but for those
who
:
*This is getting beyond a joke*
In my book this has way closer to being aggresssive than anything anyone
has replied so far.
*I understand that the Google guys don't use maven or ivy, but for those
who do (i.e. anyone serious about their builds reliability and
repeatability)*
Wow, so all
jaroslav.zar...@gmail.com
Have you read the same conversation I did?
Look what subject has the original poster chosen:
*This is getting beyond a joke*
In my book this has way closer to being aggresssive than anything anyone
has replied so far.
*I understand that the Google guys don't use
Jaroslav, your extreme reactions makes it self evident that you fit
the description =)
calling people immature aggressive kids.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
All who have responded to the original poster were polite and reserved,
which was in contrast with two hysteric messages that started this thread.
After that, being called aggressive and immature is simply
absurd; definitely not deserved.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:32 PM, nisse gammal
In any case, thanks for bringing the issue 4673 to my attention, so I
could star it.
Life is to short to complain.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To
Nice. From 23 to 37 stars in less than a day.
On Jul 14, 9:09 am, monkeyboy dilbert.elbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Kasper Hansen kbhdk1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would also wish that Google would take Maven more seriously. I can
only recommend all that agree to star
Thanks for that.
On Jul 14, 6:37 pm, monkeyboy dilbert.elbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice. From 23 to 37 stars in less than a day.
On Jul 14, 9:09 am, monkeyboy dilbert.elbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Kasper Hansen kbhdk1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would also wish that
Hang tight, folks, we're on it. As has been noted in this thread, GWT
itself is not built with maven, so it's not a 100% automated process
to push to maven central. But we're working hard to get gwt-user-2.0.4
and gwt-dev-2.0.4 uploaded by Friday and to make deployment to maven
central a part of
We do host our own repository - thats not the point. The point is that
thousands of people use GWT and use dependency management, not having
it go into central as a matter of course is simply ridiculous! It is
absolutely, point blank unprofessional.
On Jul 13, 4:32 pm, Paul Grenyer
Or, maybe you're over-estimating importance of Maven for average
GWT-developer...?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Richard Vowles richard.vow...@gmail.comwrote:
We do host our own repository - thats not the point. The point is that
thousands of people use GWT and use dependency management,
+1
On Jul 14, 10:10 am, Jaroslav Záruba jaroslav.zar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or, maybe you're over-estimating importance of Maven for average
GWT-developer...?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Richard Vowles
richard.vow...@gmail.comwrote:
We do host our own repository - thats not the
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: This is getting beyond a joke
We do host our own repository - thats not the point. The point is that
thousands of people use GWT and use dependency management, not having
it go into central as a matter of course is simply ridiculous! It is
absolutely, point blank unprofessional
I'd say so.
-Original Message-
From: Jaroslav Záruba jaroslav.zar...@gmail.com
Sender: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:10:37
To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: This is getting beyond a joke
-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:10:37 +0200
To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
ReplyTo: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: This is getting beyond a joke
Or, maybe you're over-estimating importance of Maven for average
GWT-developer...?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010
...@gmail.com
Sender: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:10:37 +0200
To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
ReplyTo: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: This is getting beyond a joke
Or, maybe you're over-estimating importance of Maven for average
GWT
GWT 2.0.4 has been out for at least two weeks now and it still isn't
in maven central. I understand that the Google guys don't use maven or
ivy, but for those who do (i.e. anyone serious about their builds
reliability and repeatability) the releases of GWT not being available
in central within a
-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Subject: This is getting beyond a joke
GWT 2.0.4 has been out for at least two weeks now and it still isn't
in maven central. I understand that the Google guys don't use maven or
ivy, but for those who do (i.e. anyone
34 matches
Mail list logo