No I just remove all elements under except the
were already resident in memory.
>
> But from Chrome 54 this is not the case anymore: it seems removing the
> script elements now immediately removes the resident application from the
> memory as well.
>
> This is what caused my app stop working and even my timers programmed in
>
the
memory as well.
This is what caused my app stop working and even my timers programmed in
the initialization step were finally not called after the scripts tags have
been removed...
On Thursday, 27 October 2016 13:17:35 UTC+2, Bruno Salmon wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> My Chrome updated ye
hi,
My Chrome updated yesterday from version 53 to 54 and this made my GWT 2.8
app stop working.
There is no error message in the console but after some investigation, I
noticed that the problem come from the timers which are not called anymore
(whatever the method: GWT Timer / Elemental2
Hi,
I'm using GwtMockito for GWT testing, and in general it works great. But,
after updating GWT from 2.5.1 to 2.6.0-rc3 one of our tests started failing:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Cannot call native method
at
This is not a GWT question so you better check for info
herehttps://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!forum/google-appengine.
I can suggest to read
thishttps://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/cron?hl=en
.
On Friday, April 26, 2013 9:09:15 PM UTC+2, membersound wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
how can I schedule a periodic timer (every X minutes) on the serverside?
I have a ScheduledExecutorService, but discovered that I cannot use this on
GAE serverside.
Is there any possibility to create a schedule task that just runs in the
background, without having to trigger it explicit
Setting the timeout to 0ms is misleading at best, and ambiguous at
worst. For one, it suggests that the timer will execute synchronously
or at least in the current event loop, but in fact it executes
asynchronously. The resolution of timers in most browsers is about
10ms, so setting the timeout
Revision: 9380
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Dec 8 11:37:11 2010
Log: Fixes $entry() wrappers for EventTarget and subtypes, Timers, and
properties of
the form Element.onclick. Adds tests to confirm that this makes the
UncaughtExceptionHandler fire properly.
http://code.google.com/p
On 2010/05/12 20:09:19, jlabanca wrote:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/503802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Adds a loading animation to the table. Adds timers to desktop and
mobile to refresh tables as data becomes available. In desktop, new
reports and expenses flash and fade out. In mobile, denied expenses
flash and fade out.
Please review this at http://gwt-code
Im trying to do a visual sort. Imagine a bubble sort where you see
the items move from one bucket to the next. The way I would move them
visually is use a Timer with an AbsolutePanel and move them up.
However, I wouldn't want to move the next guy until my last one has
finished animating. If I do
The way I would do it would be:
Timer t = new Timer() {
public void run() {
// do one pass of the sort
}
};
// Schedule the timer to run once in 5 seconds.
t.schedule(interval);
where interval is how frequently you wish to animate.
Remeber - javascript is
Hi Vitali,
That is what I'm doing now. However, I'm going to have something like
//For example
for(bin : bins)
{
moveBinToCorrectSpot(bin)
}
So each Bin will get it's own timer in moveBinToCorrectSpot that moves
it to it's right spot. However, they'll all animate at the same time.
Jeff,
I
So you would obviously have to change it. Incremental command wouldn't help
you since you are doing animation Incremental commands are just a way of
allowing long-running data processes to maintain an interactive UI -
otherwise the UI would block while you did your processing. Thus they don't
Thanks Vitali, I just made a test with IncrementalCommand, and you are
correct. I wasn't seeing the behavior I was looking for.
And I misunderstood where you wanted to use the timers. I am smacking
my forehead for not figuring that out before. Thank you very much.
That is exactly what I need
i was wondering how many timers can operate together and how would a
collisution between them effect performence
is it better to use one timer with a list of stuff that need to be
updated on timeout or is it better to make a timer for each
another thing is if i use iframe to display other
???
On Oct 22, 12:52 pm, ben fenster fenster@gmail.com wrote:
i was wondering how many timers can operate together and how would a
collisution between them effect performence
is it better to use one timer with a list of stuff that need to be
updated on timeout or is it better to make
On 22 oct, 12:52, ben fenster fenster@gmail.com wrote:
i was wondering how many timers can operate together and how would a
collisution between them effect performence
I don't think browsers set a limit, and they won't affect performance
AFAICT (unless you have really many many of them
to override setTimeout() and setInterval(), I
may be able to track what is going on.
/dave
On Jun 30, 5:12 am, Ian Bambury ianbamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely when you close the browser window (or navigate away) the timers are
gone.
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
2009/6/30 davidroe roe.da
Surely when you close the browser window (or navigate away) the timers are
gone.
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
2009/6/30 davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com
I have a situation where I need to ensure that _every_ timer launched
is closed upon exit, meaning I track each timer I create and ensure
() and setInterval(), I
may be able to track what is going on.
/dave
On Jun 30, 5:12 am, Ian Bambury ianbamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely when you close the browser window (or navigate away) the timers are
gone.
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
2009/6/30 davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com
I
I have a situation where I need to ensure that _every_ timer launched
is closed upon exit, meaning I track each timer I create and ensure
that I cancel it when the application is about to close.
is anyone aware of any timers that GWT launches that are, perhaps,
allowed to self disintegrate
blinkBlinkables is really fast and given the low interval (semi-
second), I'd use a timer re-scheduling itself, as you did with your
RPC call:
new Timer() {
public void run() {
blinkBlinkables();
this.schedule(500);
}
}.schedule(500);
I though that having 2 timers running
On 25 mar, 13:44, denis56 denis.ergashb...@gmail.com wrote:
Appreciate your recommendations.
Regarding encoding, I have tried it out with changing it to UTF-8 and
it works as expected, the page does not fit to the overall project
infrastructure though since other pages use ISO-8859-1.
On 24 mar, 03:15, denis56 denis.ergashb...@gmail.com wrote:
His,
does anyone know if there are performance implications with having 2
timers running on a single page?
I am designing an application where one timer does background fetching
of updates (2s) while the other (0.5s) updates gui
timers running along each other may be causing
the problems, should it? Maybe it is better to have just one that
would run two separate tasks (updates and blinking) or I am missing
something?
Thanks
On 24 Mrz., 04:42, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
It's all Javascript so it's all going
Thanks for the link. Not sure if I've got the concept right, but at
least I know that timers do not run in another thread :)
My latin text is coming direct from the class implementing EntryPoint.
(lblNew.setText(ÜÖ);).
I made sure its encoding is set to ISO-8859-1. Metas in HTML are also
set
On 24 mar, 13:50, denis56 denis.ergashb...@gmail.com wrote:
My latin text is coming direct from the class implementing EntryPoint.
(lblNew.setText(ÜÖ);).
I made sure its encoding is set to ISO-8859-1. Metas in HTML are also
set as meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
() {
blinkBlinkables();
this.schedule(500);
}
}.schedule(500);
I though that having 2 timers running along each other may be causing
the problems, should it? Maybe it is better to have just one that
would run two separate tasks (updates and blinking) or I am missing
something?
It would needlessly
His,
does anyone know if there are performance implications with having 2
timers running on a single page?
I am designing an application where one timer does background fetching
of updates (2s) while the other (0.5s) updates gui elements to achieve
blinking behavior. It is especially noticeable
Right, sorry that I haven't posted code before.
And the broblem is actually not in timers, because I temporarily
removed them,
there's smth else.
Here is the code:
c
// file ChartItem.java
public class ChartItem extends AbsolutePanel implements
ChartItemChanger {
private PopupMenu pp
On 3 oct, 09:47, Ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, sorry that I haven't posted code before.
And the broblem is actually not in timers, because I temporarily
removed them,
there's smth else.
[...]
mouseOnClickListener = new ChangeListener() { /* This
is the place where
Hello everybody,
I have encountered one problem:
it's well known that there's a Timer class:
com.google.gwt.user.client.Timer
and of cource it is not a secret that it works in Firefox, Opera, and
Google Chrome
without any problems,
but what's about Internet Explorer ?
Well, the answer is
Just saying something doesn't work won't get you very far. This is
especially true when the thing you claim doesn't work actually does
work.
How about providing code that demonstrates the problem?
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have
I think this is probably something you are doing. I feel that someone else
would have mentioned it before now, don't you? But without any code only the
telepathic will respond, but probably not by email.
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
2008/10/2 Ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everybody,
I
Timer works fine for me in both IE and Firefox.
Tom
Ivan wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have encountered one problem:
it's well known that there's a Timer class:
com.google.gwt.user.client.Timer
and of cource it is not a secret that it works in Firefox, Opera, and
Google Chrome
without
in gwt 1.5 Timers works OK in IE7.
what IE and GWT version are you using?
could you post test case?
our application use Timers, you can check it here:
Andrej
http://www.gwtphp.com/
On Oct 2, 3:19 pm, Ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have encountered one problem:
it's
38 matches
Mail list logo
