I have an application which is being displayed in an iframe and I need
to call a native function from it. If I run the application not in the
iframe, the code runs. But if it is in the iframe, it doesn't.
public native void PrintTop() /*-{
alert(test);
//$wnd.PrintTop
Iframe means another window context.
You show invoke window.parent.PrintTop(); instead.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit
Presumably you're using Internet Explorer...which has issues showing
HTML elements over other objects on the page that are rendered
natively by the OS (iframes, flash, select boxes, etc).
To get around this limitation, GWT utilizes a hack where you put an
iframe shim behind the popup panel's
By default flash will display on top of everything else, regardless of
any z-index Try adding ?wmode=Opaque to the end of you iFrame src
URL.
On Jul 7, 7:16 am, tobirius t.herrm...@alkacon.com wrote:
I am struggling to put UI elements above an embedded youtube iframe.
No z-index seems large
I am struggling to put UI elements above an embedded youtube iframe.
No z-index seems large enough to get on top of the iframe.
Only when using a PopupPanel it seems to be possible to show content
above the iframe. I wonder how this is done. What is so special about
the PopupPanel
I answered this question at stackoverflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2646544/debug-gwt-inside-facebook-iframe/3283940#3283940
As it is, you cannot use 127.0.0.1 as the url hostname for your facebook
app - you'll have to use a dns hostname pointing to the public ip address of
your
Thanks! Editing the hosted.html file works. I can also use 127.0.0.1 in the
iframe URL, but then I haven't enabled any cross-site request forgery
measures.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web
Hi,
We're developing a Facebook app with GWT but can't get the hosted mode
in Eclipse to work inside Facebook's iframe. Have anyone got this
working? It would make it simpler to debug some issues.
We've tried using the dev plugins for Firefox 4, Explorer 7 and Chrome
12. Firefox and Explorer
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Peter peter.sundqv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We're developing a Facebook app with GWT but can't get the hosted mode
in Eclipse to work inside Facebook's iframe. Have anyone got this
working? It would make it simpler to debug some issues.
We've tried using
I think you misunderstood. We don't want to create an iframe in GWT code.
Our GWT page is loaded in an iframe. The URL of the iframe is
http://127.0.0.1:/Page.html?gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997;. But this
doesn't work with the development mode in Eclipse.
--
You received this message
On 2011/06/07 22:05:56, fredsa wrote:
Tell me more... this is not new - the xsiframe linker does this and we
haven't heard of any problems there...
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1454802/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
ok - I'm dumb - the file that xsiframe linker is setting the contents of
the script tag and then removing it. This code sets the src of the
script tag. Probably not a good idea to remove it before the contents
come back :-)
Thanks!!
- Unnur
On 2011/06/07 22:38:26, unnurg wrote:
On
On Tuesday, 23 March, 2010 02:48 AM, Skyfort wrote:
Well, I discovered that GWT handles the whole invisible-IFrame thing
for posts, itself. So that's good news :-)
But I still don't see the onSubmitComplete handler ever getting
accessed. :(
On Mar 22, 11:33 am, Skyfortskyf...@gmail.com wrote
Hi, is there a way to capture events in html contained in iframe?
Events like when the iframe will be firing request events to server?,
thanks Xyrek
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google
Dear group,
Our GWT application (using GXT) has to be displayed inside an iFrame.
And we have a number of such iFrames in our application. My question
is is it possible to only load one instance of the GWT application
(the module iFrame) into the DOM and always use that piece of code to
generate
Hello, we create GWT Google Maps application which is displayed in
IFRAME. So far there wasn't any problem. But problem occurred when new
IE9 was released. So we had to upgrade all GWT libraries to newest
one. Now when I visit our application directly via link:
http://www.geocoder.at/willhaben.at
Hi Michal,
Bear in mind that official support for IE9 has not yet been released.
When you say running in IE9, there are many 'modes' to consider. if you are
referring to ie9 standards mode, then looks like your app was not compiled
for ie9 from what I could gather from your link above. The
thanks,
I found solution:
iframe's src should point to the html page with the gwt application not the
javascript code.
S.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
the server the page doesn't appear. It
seems that the browser doesn't support frames (but it's strange) However
i've tried to use an iframe object instead of Frameset/Frame hierarchy by
calling directly the javascript application in this way:
iframe src=mygwtapp/mygwtapp.nocache.js
(obviously
MyGwtApp.html is the page that call the generated javascript returned from
the compilation of MyGwtApp.java).
But once compiled and runned onto the server the page doesn't appear. It
seems that the browser doesn't support frames (but it's strange) However
i've tried to use an iframe
'
without iFrame.
The new HTML page on site2.com tries to load the GWT js file from site
1 like this.
script type=text/javascript language=javascript src=http://
site1.com/myapp1/myapp1.nocache.js/script
This technique should not be restricted to Cross-site-scripting and
SoP.
The code is loaded
Work fine.
I would like to embeded this App on another site 'http://site2.com'
without iFrame.
The new HTML page on site2.com tries to load the GWT js file from site
1 like this.
script type=text/javascript language=javascript src=http://
site1.com/myapp1/myapp1.nocache.js/script
/javascript language=javascript src=myapp1/
myapp1.nocache.js/script
Work fine.
I would like to embeded this App on another site 'http://site2.com'
without iFrame.
The new HTML page on site2.com tries to load the GWT js file from site
1 like this.
script type=text/javascript language
Hi,
I can also confirm this works quite smoothly: embed into an Iframe and
redirect to the own URL or a #marker URL with target=top to prevent
that.
Best Regards
Sebastian Rothbucher
On 2 Feb., 17:02, aditya sanas 007aditya.b...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
yeah ofcourse it will work
i have
This is an issue I never managed to solve in my FB apps, GWT or not. I
am not even sure it is possible in fact. Let alone the simple fact
that your iframe might be too far down the screen to even allow window
centering. What I ended up doing is position the window centered in
width and 100px down
A fixed position is pretty problematic if the iframe has a large
height value and the user is focused on the bottom of it (it will
practically not show...). Is there a way to use the mouse postion?
Re: FB API - I used this one: http://code.google.com/p/gwtfb/
Thanks,
Oren.
On Feb 8, 11:03 am
Hey,
I'm using GWT to write a simple FB canvas app. I noticed all my
centered dialogs are way off in terms of vertical placement. Digging
deeper I learned that Window.getClientHeight() returns the iframe
height and not the visible area's height and thus the dialogs are not
centered properly
Hello
I've done a GWT app which is running on it's own page; but I've a
request to embed the page into a portal.
As I need to get the job done ASAP; I'm thinking about embedding the
GWT weapp into a iframe, as
iframe src=app/myapp.html/iframe
Would it work ?
Can a GWT app detect when it's
is running on it's own page; but I've a
request to embed the page into a portal.
As I need to get the job done ASAP; I'm thinking about embedding the
GWT weapp into a iframe, as
iframe src=app/myapp.html/iframe
Would it work ?
Can a GWT app detect when it's running on a top page or on a iframe
One of my apps is running on facebook, facebook uses an iFrame to display
the application (if you're not using FBML), so yes, it does work.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, aditya sanas 007aditya.b...@gmail.comwrote:
hi,
yeah ofcourse it will work
i have implemented it in my projects but you
Well, the first test eas a complete success !!!
How to detect if your GWT is into an iframe
/*
Returns TRUE if the app is running inside a iframe
*/
private static native boolean inIframe() /*-{
return $wnd.top != $wnd;
}-*/;
On 2 feb, 17:18, Jan Mostert j...@mycee.com wrote
I put my app into CGI based framework and my GWT based app was running
inside iframe. The only difficulty was server side configuration and it
depends how the your portal organized
-Sergey
From: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
/lang/String;Ljava/
lang/String;)(arg1, arg2);
};
The callbacks work fine within components in the same iFrame, but when
I have two plugins dropped into a portal app, other iframes don't
receive the events. Firebug doesn't show any SOP errors - not sure
what to try here. I've
I have a script that sometimes will run inside an iframe an sometimes
not. How can i know if the script if running inside an iframe?
Another doubt, if the script is running inside the iframe how can i
redirect the parent window?
If I do Window.Location.assign(/newUrl) obviusly the content
Using GWT, I have placed a frame element (named frame) in a div
that's in an HTMLPanel, that's inside of a ScrollPanel, that makes
up the center element of a DockLayoutPanel.
Setting the frame's height using frame.setHeight(99%) works ok for
Chrome but not for IE or FF.
In Chrome, the frame
Revision: 8786
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Wed Sep 15 07:44:00 2010
Log: The cross-site iframe linker now loads deferred JS code via script
tags holding
the code directly. It no longer has the code in a string literal that gets
passed
around through several layers of code before being
Reviewers: unnurg,
Message:
This is a small change to the xsiframe linker. These hoops are a legacy
from the xs linker that is no longer needed. Since xsiframe has an
iframe, the code can be directly installed instead of being passed
around in a string.
Description:
The cross-site iframe linker
I have a Frame object which contain an iframe to a site. This is
working fine, but I would like to move the Frame to a different parent
without reloading the content of the iframe.
If i just do a myOtherPanel.add(frameWidget) then the Frame does move,
but the iframe content is reloaded
Some more google search shows that this is really a problem with
Firefox so there is nothing gwt can do about that. Current versions of
firefox will always reload an iframe when it is moved (https://
bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254144).
On Jul 31, 3:16 pm, mtils...@gmail.com mtils
checking if the src for that IFrame has
changed in the newly requested page so if and only if the
previously recorded src fails to load (either from cache or from
server) does it try loading the new src that the IFrame tag now
carries.
This is actually a major problem for our GWT web-app - as we
a request of the
IFrame's src without even checking if the src for that IFrame has
changed in the newly requested page so if and only if the
previously recorded src fails to load (either from cache or from
server) does it try loading the new src that the IFrame tag now
carries.
This is actually
not a reason for
a separate JS code iframe on its own.
Best Regards
Standa
On Jul 21, 4:13 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 juil, 17:06, opichals opich...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Commonly JS frameworks' .js files are simply added to the .html file
as script tags. GWT linker
Can they do that ONLY for IE 6 8? Because it doesn't look like they
want to stop caching, they want the bookmark to stop going to the old
iFrame source.
Greg
On Jul 27, 11:04 am, Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/27/2010 08:53 AM, Sony wrote:
A truly idiotic bunch at Microsoft
On 07/27/2010 10:29 AM, Greg Dougherty wrote:
Can they do that ONLY for IE 6 8? Because it doesn't look like they
want to stop caching, they want the bookmark to stop going to the old
iFrame source.
Greg
Then they'll also have to work with RewriteCond, which is an ugly
solution. Were
Greg, you understand correctly. IE attempts to load the
older.cache.html that was recorded as the src of the iframe when the
page was bookmarked instead of the src as it exists currently on the
requested page resulting in incompatibility exceptions with the newer
version on the server
Revision: 8410
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Fri Jul 23 09:44:56 2010
Log: Modifies the cross-site linker to put its code in an iframe
rather than a wrapper function.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/674802
Review by: j...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit
Revision: 8413
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Fri Jul 23 11:50:52 2010
Log: Rolling back the cross-site linker using an iframe. It's not clear
this is a safe change for all apps.
Review by: robertvaw...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8413
Added
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Modifies the cross-site linker to put its code in an iframe
rather than a wrapper function.
Review by: j...@google.com
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/674802/show
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/linker/XSLinker.java
On 20 juil, 17:06, opichals opich...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Commonly JS frameworks' .js files are simply added to the .html file
as script tags. GWT linker by default creates an iframe that contains
all the JS code script tags inside kept separate from the rest of the
application page markup
Hi!
Commonly JS frameworks' .js files are simply added to the .html file
as script tags. GWT linker by default creates an iframe that contains
all the JS code script tags inside kept separate from the rest of the
application page markup. I have been searching for the reason that led
to having
Hi, i'm trying to implement login module as a GWT application which is
placed in an iframe and calls external event handlers on login events.
The problem is i can't set handler function if iframe's DOM from
parent page.
The host page looks like
Hello Sergey,
If the login url, the iframe url and the main application url are one
the same domain then these frames will be able to directly invoke
javascript on each other. If you are going to a different domain (i.e.
the login url is on https:// instead of http://) then this will not
work
I have some JSNI code that assign a function to a variable in the
window as suggested in JSNI document: Calling a Java Method from
Handwritten JAvascript (http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/
DevGuideCodingBasicsJSNI.html#calling)
The problem is if the JSNI code runs inside an iframe
The iframe is the GWT iframe or another one? Do you have a usecase ?
Olivier
On 22 juin, 18:37, randasin r4nd7...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some JSNI code that assign a function to a variable in the
window as suggested in JSNI document: Calling a Java Method from
Handwritten JAvascript (http
another iframe
The setup is like this:
domain1/page1 has an iframe that loads domain2/page2
domain2/page2 has the GWT module.
In other words DOM looks like:
domain/page1
iframe (domain/page2)
iframe (gwt)
The module has the JSNI code that is intended to register a function
in page2
Hello everybody!
I made a GWT module as usual in its own HTML page. I tried to use this
HTML in my application in an iframe. The module builds up its UI in
the onModuleLoad method, then makes an RPC request to fill the widgets
with data. This works well in IE, Chrome and Opera. However
I want to create an Iframe structure from gwt code It's possible?
Thx, Marco.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Hi,
Frame frame = new Frame();
frame.setUrl(url);
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Thx. But if i want to add a widget element, a flextabale for
example???
On 6 Apr, 16:46, mariyan nenchev nenchev.mari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Frame frame = new Frame();
frame.setUrl(url);
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
You'd have to add a flextable to the page that you are showing in your
iframe
On Apr 6, 4:06 pm, gadaleta.marco gadaleta.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Thx. But if i want to add a widget element, a flextabale for
example???
On 6 Apr, 16:46, mariyan nenchev nenchev.mari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I want to add a widget not a url..
2010/4/6 Jon Vaughan jsvaug...@gmail.com
You'd have to add a flextable to the page that you are showing in your
iframe
On Apr 6, 4:06 pm, gadaleta.marco gadaleta.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Thx. But if i want to add a widget element, a flextabale
Where do you want to add this widget? In the frame - it is not possible!
Under the frame for example? Just add the frame to some container and after
that add the widget to the same container.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
Why do you need to add widget in frame? Makes no sense! Frame loads other
page if you want to have a widget in the frame you have to add it in some
way in the other page. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this
The problem is, that each Widget has a DOM Element it wraps. This DOM
Element is created by the document.createElement('tagname') JavaScript
method and the call to this method is not accessible to you, since it is
wrapped by GWT's Document class.
An iframe contains it's own document, so you would
On android for example, the scrolls of scrollpane are not visible.
If i can embedded a Flextable inside a iframe i can use the android browser
scrollbar system...
That's the right
2010/4/6 mariyan nenchev nenchev.mari...@gmail.com
Why do you need to add widget in frame? Makes no sense! Frame
Can you tell me how i can load a flextable into a page that isn't the main
project page ?
.
2010/4/6 Marco Gadaleta gadaleta.ma...@gmail.com
On android for example, the scrolls of scrollpane are not visible.
If i can embedded a Flextable inside a iframe i can use the android browser
scrollbar
I would create two modules in my GWT app. The first module is the
application itself, it will be started and runs as expected. The second
module contains only these parts, that are required to run inside the
iframe. You can create the iframe and load your app's JavaScript into the
iframe's
Well, I discovered that GWT handles the whole invisible-IFrame thing
for posts, itself. So that's good news :-)
But I still don't see the onSubmitComplete handler ever getting
accessed. :(
On Mar 22, 11:33 am, Skyfort skyf...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a tricky thing (for me, at least ;)...I need
Still haven't found a solution. Anyone out there have a clue what to
do?
On Mar 4, 3:49 pm, John john.m.daugh...@gmail.com wrote:
Any help would be appreciated!
Firefox reloads the contents of iframes when they are unhidden.
So, if you have a TabPanel, where each tab holds an iframe
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Updates the IFRame and XS selection script templates to support
inlined selection scripts. There are two changes involved:
1. There is a baseUrl meta property that can be used to override
the choice of base URL.
2. Meta tags can be made to apply to only module
Joel, can you review this?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/159810/diff/1/3
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/linker/XSTemplate.js (left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/159810/diff/1/3#oldcode291
Line 291: processMetas();
This ordering is necessary because the meta props now
:
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Updates the IFRame and XS selection script templates to support
inlined selection scripts. There are two changes involved:
1. There is a baseUrl meta property that can be used to override
the choice of base URL.
2. Meta tags can be made to apply to only module
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/159810/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/linker/IFrameTemplate.js (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/159810/diff/1/2#newcode200
Line 200: }
Clever. I like it.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/159810/diff/1/3
File
as a
potential refactoring.
Ian
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:23 AM, sp...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Updates the IFRame and XS selection script templates to support
inlined selection scripts. There are two changes involved:
1. There is a baseUrl meta property that can
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Ian Petersen ispet...@gmail.com wrote:
Just idle curiosity here, but why did you have to make the same change
twice? I know you're modifying selection scripts, and maybe that
means you need to violate DRY for some reason, but it strikes me as a
potential
Revision: 7686
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Mon Mar 8 12:02:36 2010
Log: Updates the IFRame and XS selection script templates to support
inlined selection scripts. There are two changes involved:
1. There is a baseUrl meta property that can be used to override
the choice of base URL.
2
Max,
You're right simply calling getUrl() doesn't work. It's a mystery to me why
that isHowever, I have found this works (at least in Firefox).
com.google.gwt.dom.client.FrameElement e =
((FrameElement)(cachedArticleFrame.getElement().cast()));
Any help would be appreciated!
Firefox reloads the contents of iframes when they are unhidden.
So, if you have a TabPanel, where each tab holds an iframe, moving
between tabs reloads the frame. Chrome and IE leave the frame alone,
but Firefox closes it when you hide it. For example, if you have
Max,
You're right simply calling getUrl() doesn't work. It's a mystery to me why
that isHowever, I have found this works (at least in Firefox).
com.google.gwt.dom.client.FrameElement e =
((FrameElement)(cachedArticleFrame.getElement().cast()));
iframes are quite difficult to manage.
Policies about parent page-iframe son communications are quite strict.
In fact you can access to the iframe's context(window's properties and
document) only when main page and iframe shares the same domain.
In case domains differ , inspecting the frame
. And also i want to know is it possible to contral the GWT
compiler output. I want to the gwt compiler to create the object in
the document body itself.. not in a iframe..
-Kittu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group
of the iframe, and
auto-refresh in an attempt to catch the account verification that may occur
in a separate tab. To do this though, you'll need to catch the response,
otherwise you'll end up with an iframe that appears to be refreshing the
same content.
Net, net: there is some room for improvement within
which lets users know that
they'll need to either a) refresh your app once they have verified their
account creation, or b) click the sign-out link and sign back in with their
newly verified account.
You could also set a timer that inspects the contents of the iframe, and
auto-refresh
This thread might help out:
https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/e0b7683069497bcf/e6d2814e79bc3a45?#e6d2814e79bc3a45
-- Chris
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:39 PM, John V Denley
johnvden...@googlemail.comwrote:
I forgot the line from where I am getting the URL:
Thanks Chris, Hard Coding is what Ive had to end up doing too... quite
irritating though
Incidentally I have cracked the other two problems this evening too, namely
(a) how to set the parent URL from within the iframe and (b) how to get make
sure that after logging into the google account
is
the usual iframe loading, and a second one where the script is loaded
into an anonymous function inside the current window context (they
refer to this way as mashup).
I have looked around but I was unable to find any documentation
about.
My question are:
1)Is this mashup modality already supported?
2)Where
On 16 Feb, 20:44, Fabiano ftar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have looked around but I was unable to find any documentation
about.
I have found out something:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/FAQ_Server.html
There are five lines about (the search-key, in order to find this, has
been
My application requires a login to a google account.
I have been looking at trying to do this login step within a GWT frame
which works fine.
The problem is that once that login has been completed my application
then loads INSIDE the frame, I really want it to reload in the parent
window. I have
OK, I think I might have figured out what the problem is... when Im
creating the frame Im trying to set it using the following line:
The resulting URL is /_ah/login?continue=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost
%3A%2F so the problem is that it is stripping out the /
I forgot the line from where I am getting the URL:
loginInfo.getLoginUrl()
On Feb 14, 11:16 pm, John V Denley johnvden...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK, I think I might have figured out what the problem is... when Im
creating the frame Im trying to set it using the following line:
The resulting
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/138805/diff/1/6
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/History.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/138805/diff/1/6#newcode64
Line 64: // Set impl to null as a flag to no-op future calls.
This should test if 'impl' is null too; it's a different
, it will
GWT.create(HistoryImpl.class), and thus attempt to find the iframe, but I
believe it's been this way for a long time. Are you sure you're not
referencing History somewhere?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I rebuild my apps with 2.0.1 and noticed
(HistoryImpl.class), and thus attempt to find the iframe, but I
believe it's been this way for a long time. Are you sure you're not
referencing History somewhere?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I rebuild my apps with 2.0.1 and noticed that they no longer
=4584
On Feb 4, 6:36 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
It shouldn't be -- if you kick off History's static initializer, it will
GWT.create(HistoryImpl.class), and thus attempt to find the iframe, but I
believe it's been this way for a long time. Are you sure you're not
referencing
=4584
On Feb 4, 6:36 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
It shouldn't be -- if you kick off History's static initializer, it will
GWT.create(HistoryImpl.class), and thus attempt to find the iframe, but I
believe it's been this way for a long time. Are you sure you're not
referencing
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
When the History iframe is absent, History is disabled in IE and impl
will be set to null. Using some of the methods in History will result
in an NPE, only in IE.
This affects PopupPanel, which adds a history handler automatically and
throws an NPE in IE
On 2010/02/05 16:24:02, jlabanca wrote:
LGTM.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/138805
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Hi,
I rebuild my apps with 2.0.1 and noticed that they no longer start.
In DevMode is see an error about the History Support that fails to
initialize.
My apps do not support history, so I did not include the IFrame... has
this become mandatory or is this a little oops ?
David
--
http
It shouldn't be -- if you kick off History's static initializer, it will
GWT.create(HistoryImpl.class), and thus attempt to find the iframe, but I
believe it's been this way for a long time. Are you sure you're not
referencing History somewhere?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, stuckagain
), and thus attempt to find the iframe, but I
believe it's been this way for a long time. Are you sure you're not
referencing History somewhere?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I rebuild my apps with 2.0.1 and noticed that they no longer start
101 - 200 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
