thank you, that is quite explanatory :)
indeed i had of course looked at the comments while looking at the
code but didnt made much sense to me since i'm not a DOM / javascript
guy.
On Oct 22, 3:16 pm, walden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PopupPanel uses a different technique for setVisible. Sin
PopupPanel uses a different technique for setVisible. Since you're
reading the code (good idea) you should read the comment there.
By the way, I was wrong about "deferred positioning", at least in the
sense I meant it. I assumed there was a DeferredCommand down in
there, but there isn't.
'visi
btw, do you (or anybody) know how does that work exactly ?
looking at the code, it makes popup invisible, shows it (didnt
understand what differs from making visible), gives callback a chance
to position and finally makes popup visible. i can not figure out how
that prevents a jump effect.. ?!
O
Ian,
I thought I was also giving a general answer by pointing to an
implementation of what we might term the "deferred positioning"
pattern.
Walden
On Oct 21, 11:22 am, "Ian Bambury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I knew that! But the original question appeared to be more general to me.
>
> Wrong
I knew that! But the original question appeared to be more general to me.
Wrong again.
@raft
Sorry, +ve is shorthand for positive, -ve for negative. That's my
electronics experience showing :-(
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
2008/10/21 walden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> See: PopupPanel.setPop
thank you. that is the offical solution i was looking for :)
On Oct 21, 5:44 pm, walden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See: PopupPanel.setPopupPositionAndShow(PositionCallback callback). I
> have not had a problem with flicker.
>
> Walden
>
> On Oct 21, 10:36 am, r a f t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See: PopupPanel.setPopupPositionAndShow(PositionCallback callback). I
have not had a problem with flicker.
Walden
On Oct 21, 10:36 am, r a f t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thank you. that sounds to be a good solution. what is that +ve by the
> way ?
>
> On Oct 21, 5:28 pm, "Ian Bambury" <[EMAIL
thank you. that sounds to be a good solution. what is that +ve by the
way ?
On Oct 21, 5:28 pm, "Ian Bambury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK, it has to be attached and (theoretically) visible for you to get the
> size, but you can set the left position to -2 or something silly so it
> won
AFAIK, it has to be attached and (theoretically) visible for you to get the
size, but you can set the left position to -2 or something silly so it
won't be seen. Not +ve or you might get scroll-bars. If you find a better
way, please post it :-)
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
2008/10/21 r a
hello,
placing certain widgets (such as a popup) requires size of widget, so
is it possible to get the size of a widget before making it visible ?
getOffsetWidth() / Height() methods return zero when widget is not
visible.
making widget visible, getting size and then placing it seems to be
wor
10 matches
Mail list logo