[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT and Chrome (fast!)

I wasn't suggesting that GWT slowed down Chrome, only that it sped up other browsers!, such that maybe it made Chrome's performance lead look smaller than it is! Imagine that GWT output was much like handwritten JS in other libraries with lots of prototype-based OO. It might be the case that other

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT and Chrome (fast!)

We'll probably want to blog about it at some point, but our experience is that GWT + Chrome = Crazy Delicious. The fact that we never redefine functions or modify class prototypes ensures we never invalidate Chrome's optimization assumptions. We asked them what we might change in GWT's output to

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT and Chrome (fast!)

On 2 sep, 23:01, "Ray Cromwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey guys, >   I ran a preliminary benchmark on Chrome using Chronoscope [...], > and the numbers are pretty good. That's really good news! I'm running Chrome for a couple hours now and it looks terribly fast. Here are my Dromaeo result

[gwt-contrib] GWT and Chrome (fast!)

Hey guys, I ran a preliminary benchmark on Chrome using Chronoscope (see here: http://timepedia.blogspot.com/2008/09/google-chrome-smokes-competition-on.html), and the numbers are pretty good. Chronoscope I think would be a fairly typical rich AIR/Silverlight like workload for the browser, as su

[gwt-contrib] Code Review Request - Window event fix

Joel - Please review this patch which fixes a bug in the Window event system. Description: = In order for Window to sink events on the outer window, it adds a script element to the page and then executes the init method in the context of the Window. However, in some cases, the script tag

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r3547 - in trunk: . dev/core dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev distro-source distro-source/core/src

Freeland, who was the reviewer on this? Also: did you patch up the "Subversion" instance in about.html? On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Rajeev Dayal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed the following issue (I did not review the entire patch): > > About.java, line 35: Need the static keyword her

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r3547 - in trunk: . dev/core dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev distro-source distro-source/core/src

I noticed the following issue (I did not review the entire patch): About.java, line 35: Need the static keyword here; this should be a static initializer, not an instance initializer. Rajeev On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:03

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r3605 - changes/spoon/runAsync/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl

Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Sep 2 12:03:08 2008 New Revision: 3605 Modified: changes/spoon/runAsync/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/FragmentLoaderCreator.java Log: Adds a non-supported mode for compiling a program such that all runAsync callbacks are compiled out. Modifi

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r3603 - changes/spoon/runAsync/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl

Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Sep 2 11:57:03 2008 New Revision: 3603 Modified: changes/spoon/runAsync/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/FragmentMapper.java Log: When logging which method goes into which fragment, group the log lines by fragment. That is, first show what's in

[gwt-contrib] Fwd: Issue 2607: GWT trunk hosted mode crash

-- Forwarded message -- From: Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 1:50 PM Subject: Issue 2607: GWT trunk hosted mode crash To: John Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] John, I'm running into a problem where an exception that shows up as "Unexpected

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r3602 - wiki

Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Sep 2 08:50:13 2008 New Revision: 3602 Modified: wiki/RpcAuth.wiki Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface. Modified: wiki/RpcAuth.wiki == --- wiki/RpcAuth.wiki (origi

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 1.5 - Accessibility / ARIA support

Hi all, I know that this thread has been silent for a while, and I apologize. Alex and I have completed the a11y documentation, and it can be found here: http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5&s=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5&t=DevGuideAccessibility Let us know if there are a

[gwt-contrib] Re: New JSON API proposal

On Sep 2, 12:50 am, "Ray Cromwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems to me that it wouldn't be that hard to build a simple lexical > scanner and recursive decent parser for JSON that avoids eval > altogether. For most JSON payloads its performance probably wouldn't > matter. But for some JSON pa

[gwt-contrib] Re: NPE's

The fix was included in GALGWT r724 . Thanks, On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Ray Cromwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > No problem. I also posted a corresponding patch for GALGWT that fixes > the bug in the GadgetGenerator which t