Are you extending MonthSelector or DatePickerComponent? MonthSelector is
public, so if you are extending that, could you create an issue, as that
should darn well work, though you will have to create a new subclass of
DatePicker to use your new month selector as well.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:00
Why is the class DatePickerComponent of the DatePicker protected ? I
want to add my own MonthSelector, but when I do this, it throws an
access exception because this class it protected :(
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contri
Thanks, Wayne. I posted a patch earlier today that seems to fix the problem.
If you're in a position to try it out, that would be greatly appreciated.
joel.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:09 PM, WRL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just updated 2909 with an example.
>
> Thanks,
> Wayne
>
> >
>
--~--~
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Sep 24 12:42:55 2008
New Revision: 3679
Modified:
changes/jat/oophm-branch/plugins/common/ByteOrder.h
changes/jat/oophm-branch/plugins/common/HostChannel.h
changes/jat/oophm-branch/plugins/common/Socket.cpp
changes/jat/oophm-branch/plugins/commo
Nope, but I was about to, so it would definitely be appreciated. Have you
signed a Contributors agreement yet? (found here:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html#clas)
Also, the DatePicker now being prepped for 1.6 has been moved to
com.google.gwt.gen2.datepicker, so if you coul
Glad to hear it. The patch is against trunk, but we can always merge it down
into 1.5 if necessary.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Sam Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, the patch fixes issue 2905 for me.
> What version of GWT will this patch target?
> -Sam
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:5
Dear all GWT contributors,
Is anyone working on the DatePicker's setAllowableDate implementation?
I ask as I have already written code for this functionality. Let me
know if you would like to review it.
Best,
JP.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/gr
I just updated 2909 with an example.
Thanks,
Wayne
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[+ Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors, and Scott and Joel in particular]
So the idea here is to add a hook that allows an observer to keep a
log of CSS operations? Why just CSS and not DOM operations in general?
The DOM class itself is probably the wrong place, as I believe it's
all but deprecated
For the work that I've been doing on a Google product that is built with
GWT, I put together a breadcrumb
navigation widget. The design is based on a delegate approach (similar to
Apple's pattern for UI widgets
in Cocoa and Cocoa Touch) where the user of the widget provides a delegate
that returns
Hi All
I am creating a gwt application and wants to integrate Google Adsense
in my application. I explored Google Adsense and was able to get a
java script which I need to put in my html page to show Google Ads.
But Now I didn't get any way of placing this java script into my GWT
application. One
Where can I find normal GWT version for linux now?
The link is broken.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Does this proposal mean that if I want to receive the equivilant of
todays Event.MOUSEEVENTS, that I have to call:
widget.addMouseDownHandler( new MouseDownHandler() { ... } );
widget.addMouseUpHandler( new MouseUpHandler() { ... } );
widget.addMouseMoveHandler( new MouseMoveHandler() { ...
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Joel Webber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like you to have a look at the following changes to Safari's history
> implementation. They're meant to work around the bizarre issues caused by
> setting Safari's location.hash to an empty string. Please pay particular
John,
I'd like you to have a look at the following changes to Safari's history
implementation. They're meant to work around the bizarre issues caused by
setting Safari's location.hash to an empty string. Please pay particular
attention to the ugly URL rewriting code I added to HistoryImplSafari.
P
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:53 AM, BobV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SourceInfo is now an abstract class with a protected constructor.
> Each AST package has its own SourceInfo subtype with package-protected
> constructors to ensure that only the relevant program type constructs
> SourceInfo object
Changes from previous patch:
- SourceInfos are now created only via JProgram and JsProgram.
Descendant collection is now a field in the program types.
- Optimized getRoots() call in SourceInfo
- Addressed nits
SourceInfo is now an abstract class with a protected constructor.
Each AST package
It all sounds good to me.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Committed as r853 and r854. Thanks for the review.
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Miguel Méndez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> LGTM just a couple of nits below.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at
Committed as r853 and r854. Thanks for the review.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Miguel Méndez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LGTM just a couple of nits below.
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> A
>> samples/gadgetrpc/src/com/google/gwt/gadgets/sampl
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Sep 24 08:14:01 2008
New Revision: 3677
Added:
changes/jat/oophm-branch/
- copied from r3676, /branches/oophm/
Log:
Create change branch for merging XPCOM into current OOPHM branch so I can
checkpoint working pieces there.
--~--~-~--~~
Thanks Joel,
I think I understand you but let me overview my situation and fire
some questions.
My situation is legal situation I think:
I have a man part of the page that I want to use to show some static
information. There for I put the main page aside like explained above
and add the HTML tex
LGTM just a couple of nits below.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A
> samples/gadgetrpc/src/com/google/gwt/gadgets/sample/gadgetrpc/server/GadgetRPCServlet.java
>
Nit: Add @SuppressWarning("serial"). Did you intend to have the
servletStartTime field be st
To reiterate:
- RootPanel.detachOnWindowClose() must be called for all widgets that "have
no parents".
- This is implicitly called by Widgets' wrap() methods and
RootPanel.get(id).
- All widgets for which this method is called will remain marked as
'attached' until RootPanel.detachNow() is call
23 matches
Mail list logo
