Good news! Are there plans to consolidate ClientBundle and i18n
messages constants?
It would be very nice to have a single bundle for all resources of a
widget to streamline the widget cusomization.
On 14 Apr., 01:55, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
I've deprecated the public
Hi arun
U can use GwtSwfExt lib for uploading files(gmail style file upload).
This lib is wrapper on SWFUpload .
http://code.google.com/p/gwtswfext/
Thanks
Dug
On Apr 9, 12:58 am, arun.r...@gmail.com ashwinkva...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I am getting multipart false on server side even i am
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:02 AM, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
Good news! Are there plans to consolidate ClientBundle and i18n
messages constants?
It would be very nice to have a single bundle for all resources of a
widget to streamline the widget cusomization.
As an interim step,
No update yet, unfortunately. We have to get ourselves organized again now
that GWT 1.6 is out the door, and then we'll have a better idea of when it
will be available.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Gary Miller miller.ga...@gmail.comwrote:
Any news on when UiBinder will be available to the
It still sounds to me like the route Scott suggested and Bob agreed with
would be better, so as to avoid the whole issue of re-lexing the JS during
link.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Should've mentioned this in the original post, but probably the
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Apr 14 07:19:33 2009
New Revision: 5229
Modified:
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JClassLiteral.java
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JProgram.java
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaAST.java
I fail to see how this resolves arun's bug with GWT form panel
-jason
On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Dug wrote:
Hi arun
U can use GwtSwfExt lib for uploading files(gmail style file upload).
This lib is wrapper on SWFUpload .
http://code.google.com/p/gwtswfext/
Thanks
Dug
On Apr 9,
Hi,
So I like GWT and I like Google App Engine, all I want is a simple
recipe for getting the two to work without hitting too many big
problems.
I'm willing to use DTO, I'm willing to suffer whatever I have to do -
but I need to know what's the best current way to do it.
Thanks, Philip
On Apr
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Tue Apr 14 08:40:48 2009
New Revision: 5230
Modified:
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozilla.java
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozillaOld.java
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplSafari.java
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:26 AM, philip philip14...@gmail.com wrote:
So I like GWT and I like Google App Engine, all I want is a simple
recipe for getting the two to work without hitting too many big
problems.
I'm willing to use DTO, I'm willing to suffer whatever I have to do -
but I need
As you get organized for the next release(s), It would be nice to have
more frequent releases with one or two major features. There are some
major enhancements sitting in trunk (RunAsync is the one I'm really
looking forward too). I realize this might not be possible with this
type of project
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Tue Apr 14 09:10:36 2009
New Revision: 5231
Modified:
branches/snapshot-2009.03.30-r5111/branch-info.txt
branches/snapshot-2009.03.30-r5111/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozilla.java
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Chris chrish...@gmail.com wrote:
As you get organized for the next release(s), It would be nice to have
more frequent releases with one or two major features. There are some
major enhancements sitting in trunk (RunAsync is the one I'm really
looking forward
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:03 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
GWT RPC does not preserve identity across the wire, and the GWT compiler
needs the source of the classes at compile time.
The only way I see it working would be to add a flag requiring preserving
object identity across
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Toby Reyelts to...@google.com wrote:
I think this is a false dichotomy. JDO has fetch-groups for just that kind
of scenario. You send down a slice of an object graph that meets exactly
your needs. You don't have to re-invent an entire DTO layer just to send a
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Toby Reyelts to...@google.com wrote:
I think this is a false dichotomy. JDO has fetch-groups for just that
kind
of scenario. You send down a slice of an object graph that meets
Scott: I'm not sure I agree... shouldn't that arg handler get setup in
Precompile.ArgProcessor?
Me: Ok.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/22802
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
This is a good change overall. Compiler should accept -soyc.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/22802
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/list?can=2q=-Milestone:1_6_RCcolspec=ID+Type+Status+Priority+Milestone+Owner+Summarycells=tiles
That should help.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Luminari luminari...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to make a request to clear up the Issue
On Apr 14, 12:59 pm, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Chris chrish...@gmail.com wrote:
No promises, but it's worth noting that trunk is quite stable these days.
Teams within Google are using the trunk all the time, so we have an
incentive to keep it
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Tue Apr 14 14:05:42 2009
New Revision: 5232
Modified:
wiki/CodeSplitting.wiki
Log:
Changed the async modules pattern to be called async provider
Modified: wiki/CodeSplitting.wiki
==
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Tue Apr 14 16:17:25 2009
New Revision: 5235
Added:
branches/snapshot-2009.04.14-r5230/
- copied from r5234, /branches/snapshot-2009.04.14/
Removed:
branches/snapshot-2009.04.14/
Log:
Includes the revision number
Joel, a javadoc tweak for your TBR:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5237
rjrjr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Tue Apr 14 15:59:28 2009
New Revision: 5234
Added:
branches/snapshot-2009.04.14/
- copied from r5230, /trunk/
Log:
Creates snapshot-2009.04.14 from tr...@5230 via svn copy -r 5230
https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Tue Apr 14 17:01:10 2009
New Revision: 5237
Modified:
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/Cookies.java
Log:
Tweaks docs on secure cookies, fixing issue 1638
tbr: jgw
Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/Cookies.java
I hope I am not being naive (or reiterating an existing post), but I
am not concerned with identity, nor concerned with expecting my ORM
solution to deal with entities created on the client.
I think all I need is a way to use an entity as a DTO without needing
a second set of model objects.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Robert Hanson
iamroberthan...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope I am not being naive (or reiterating an existing post), but I
am not concerned with identity, nor concerned with expecting my ORM
solution to deal with entities created on the client.
I think all I need
27 matches
Mail list logo
